Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods ►

Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravascular thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To assess the effects of receiving endovascular thrombectomy with intravascular thrombolysis versus without intravascular thrombolysis on functional independence (defined as a modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) of < 3) at up to 90 days in people with acute ischaemic stroke.

This is a protocol.

Published:

13 February 2024

Authors:

Gottlieb M, Carlson JN, Westrick J, Peksa GD

See the full Review on

the Cochrane Library

►

Was this helpful? Donate.

If you found this evidence helpful, please consider donating to Cochrane. We are a charity that produces accessible evidence to help people make health and care decisions.
Donate
Print
PDF
Citation
Gottlieb M, Carlson JN, Westrick J, Peksa GD. Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravascular thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2024, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD015721. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015721.