Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods ►

Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular hole

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To compare the effectiveness and safety of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique with conventional ILM peeling in treating large macular holes (MHs).

This is a protocol.

Published:

17 December 2021

Authors:

Ghoraba H, Abdelkarem AAhmed, Akhavanrezayat A, Matsumiya W, Karaca I, Mishra K, Yasar C, Pham B, Mobasserian A, Nguyen QD

Primary Review Group:

Eyes and Vision Group

See the full Review on

the Cochrane Library

►

Print
PDF
Citation
Ghoraba H, Abdelkarem AAhmed, Akhavanrezayat A, Matsumiya W, Karaca I, Mishra K, Yasar C, Pham B, Mobasserian A, Nguyen QD. Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular hole (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD015031. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015031.