跳转到主要内容

In vitro fertilisation versus tubal reanastomosis (sterilisation reversal) for subfertility after tubal sterilisation

Many women choose tubal sterilisation as a way of birth control. Even if a small percentage of women later regret the decision, large numbers of women will seek counselling regarding reversal from their physicians. The review authors searched the literature and were unable to find any trial that met the criteria for this review. There is little likelihood that any future research will be conducted to compare IVF with tubal reanastomosis for subfertility after tubal sterilisation. Therefore this review will not be updated in the future.

研究背景

Tubal sterilisation is the most popular contraceptive method in the world. Approximately 138 million women of reproductive age have had tubal sterilisation and there is evidence that increasingly younger women are being sterilized. With such large numbers of women choosing this option of birth control, it is clear that even if a small percentage of women later regret the decision, large numbers of women will seek counselling regarding reversal from their physicians.

研究目的

To compare the efficacy of surgical tubal reanastomosis and in vitro fertilisation in terms of live birth rates. The morbidity and cost-effectiveness of both techniques were also to be compared.

检索策略

In a recent update of this review the following databases were searched: Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Review Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1966 to 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2009), PsychInfo (1806-2009) and CENTRAL (2nd quarter 2009). We handsearched the reference lists of trials, reviews and relevant textbooks; searched abstracts from relevant conferences, and personally communicated with experts in the field.

纳入排除标准

Randomised trials comparing surgical reversal of tubal sterilisation with in vitro fertilisation (IVF).

资料收集与分析

No RCTs were found that met the selection criteria.

主要结果

No data exist on which to report.

作者结论

There is little likelihood that any future research will be conducted to compare IVF with tubal reanastomosis for subfertility after tubal sterilisation. Therefore this review will not be updated in the future.

引用文献
Yossry M, Aboulghar M, D'Angelo A, Gillett W. In vitro fertilisation versus tubal reanastomosis (sterilisation reversal) for subfertility after tubal sterilisation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD004144. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004144.pub2.

我们的Cookie使用

我们使用必要的cookie来使我们的网站工作。我们还希望设置可选的分析cookie,以帮助我们进行改进。除非您启用它们,否则我们不会设置可选的cookie。使用此工具将在您的设备上设置一个cookie来记住您的偏好。您随时可以随时通过单击每个页面页脚中的“Cookies设置”链接来更改您的Cookie首选项。
有关我们使用cookie的更多详细信息,请参阅我们的Cookies页面

接受全部
配置