Przejdź do treści

Interactive Learning

Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an Intervention Review

Treści dostępne wyłącznie w języku angielskim

What systematic reviews are, why they are useful, framing a review question, process for reviews.

Why protocols are a crucial step, components of a protocol, framing eligibility criteria.

Why systematic and rigorous searches are important, planning and designing search strategies, sources of studies, managing and reporting the process.

How to select studies for inclusion, systematically collecting different data types that meet criteria.

What bias is, how to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials in different sources.

How to analyse different types of data, effect measures, undertaking meta-analysis, recognizing heterogeneity.

How to interpret results of statistical analysis, reporting bias, using GRADE method to report on certainty of evidence.

The reporting process, creating ‘Summary of findings’ tables, writing up results, discussing evidence, drawing conclusions, summary formats.

Introducing health economics and considerations for this in a systematic review.

Introduction to  network meta-analysis (NMA) in the context of a systematic review of randomized trials.

Putting the equity lens on your systematic review.

Getting started with qualitative evidence synthesis, taking stock of evidence, synthesising and developing findings and writing up a report.

How to conduct a rapid review, including key differences from systematic reviews and practical approaches to streamline the process.

Certificates

Download your certificates

4.7
3402 reviews
5 stars
79%
4 stars
14%
3 stars
3%
2 stars
1%
1 star
3%
Germán José M - 17 Sierpień 2021
Filippo L - 17 Sierpień 2021
Helpful (1)
Zahraa H - 16 Sierpień 2021
Amazing !
Thank you !
Helpful (0)
Anonymous - 15 Sierpień 2021
The course is well-structured, clear and easy to navigate. Sometimes it is unclear what needs to be clicked for further information to complete the module. In the assessments, if more than two questions in the assessment are incorrect it can be difficult to remember which modules need reviewing. Being taken to a page with the modules that need to be reviewed would be helpful. Some questions are difficult to understand eg. Whether a study assessor is using the same outcome tool as the patient
Ahmad R - 14 Sierpień 2021
Brenda Stefania P - 13 Sierpień 2021
Alma C - 11 Sierpień 2021
Anonymous - 11 Sierpień 2021
Omar Ricardo D - 10 Sierpień 2021
Seleno J - 9 Sierpień 2021
Anonymous - 9 Sierpień 2021
Helpful (1)
Amaya S - 7 Sierpień 2021
The content was good but the distribution within the modules made it hard to retain information. It would be better if the Module's lessons could all be seen at a glance (like Wikipedia), with title, headings, subheadings, and content paragraphs. In this manner, one can choose to see all the information if one wishes to review or compare the text. The second part of the institute with the live lectures and powerpoints was much easier to go through.
Andrew L - 6 Sierpień 2021
Ignacio M - 6 Sierpień 2021
Anonymous - 5 Sierpień 2021
Anonymous - 5 Sierpień 2021
María José H - 4 Sierpień 2021
Patricia K - 4 Sierpień 2021
LUCY YANELA H - 4 Sierpień 2021
andrea F - 4 Sierpień 2021

Używamy plików cookie

Używamy niezbędnych plików cookie, aby nasza strona mogła działać. Chcielibyśmy również ustawić opcjonalne pliki cookie do analizy, aby pomóc nam udoskonalić tę stronę. Nie będziemy ustawiać opcjonalnych plików cookie, chyba że je włączysz. Użycie tego narzędzia spowoduje ustawienie pliku cookie na Twoim urządzeniu, aby zapamiętać Twoje preferencje. W każdej chwili możesz zmienić swoje preferencje dotyczące plików cookie, klikając na link "Ustawienia plików cookie" znajdujący się w stopce każdej strony.
Bardziej szczegółowe informacje na temat używanych przez nas plików cookie można znaleźć na naszej stronieStrona plików cookies

Zaakceptuj wszystkie
Skonfiguruj