移至主內容

Featured Review: Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks’ gestation

This news item is more than 5 years old.
Image
A pregnant woman sat on a bed, she is holding her lower back

A normal pregnancy lasts about 40 weeks (the gestation period) from the start of the woman's last menstrual period. If a pregnancy lasts too long, a woman and her clinician may wish to stimulate the woman’s body to begin labour. This is called induction.

Babies may be at a greater risk of death, before or shortly after birth, after prolonged gestation. However, induction of labour may also have risks for mothers and their babies, especially if women are not ready to labour.

Current tests cannot predict whether babies would be better to stay inside their mother or whether labour should be induced to make the birth happen sooner. Many hospitals therefore have policies for how long pregnancies should continue.

This updated Cochrane systematic review examined whether inducing labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation, could reduce risks for the babies.

The referenced media source is missing and needs to be re-embedded.

The studies
The authors identified 34 studies with more than 21,000 women that compared a policy to induce labour, usually after 41 completed weeks of gestation, with waiting for labour to start or waiting for a period before inducing labour, or both. The studies took place in Austria, Canada, China, India, Finland, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, UK and USA.

Results
There were fewer deaths of babies in hospitals that had a policy to induce labour after a certain time compared with waiting for labour to start naturally. There were fewer admissions to the intensive care nursery and fewer low Apgar scores at five minutes after birth (a simple health test for babies) in the induction groups compared with waiting.

Fewer caesarean births were required with induction compared with waiting, with similar rates for assisted vaginal birth, whether induced or not.

The authors did not find any clear differences between waiting for labour to start naturally compared with a policy to induce labour at or later than 37 weeks in: the risks of mothers having trauma to their perineum; bleeding after birth; the length of mothers' stay in hospital; breastfeeding; babies having early abnormal neurological function (encephalopathy); or birth trauma.

None of the trials provided information on postnatal depression or child development.

Certainty of the evidence
Most included studies were well conducted and well reported. The authors’ certainty (confidence) in the evidence is generally moderate to high.

The referenced media source is missing and needs to be re-embedded.

Key message from this review
A policy of labour induction compared with waiting for labour to start is associated with fewer deaths of babies and fewer caesarean sections; with no clear difference in assisted vaginal births. While the optimal time for induction in low-risk women is not yet clear, offering women tailored counselling may help them to make an informed choice between induction of labour for pregnancies - particularly those continuing beyond 41 weeks – and waiting for labour to start naturally, or waiting a specified time before inducing labour. Counselling needs to ensure that women's values and preferences are discussed.

The review includes evidence published up to 17 July 2019.

  • Read the full review here
  • Visit the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth group here
  • Read the review in Malay

我們對Cookie的使用

我們使用必要的 cookie 使我們的網站正常運作。我們還希望設置可選擇分析的 cookie,以幫助我們進行改進網站。除非您啟用它們,否則我們不會設置可選擇的 cookie。使用此工具將在您的設備上設置 cookie,以記住您的偏好。您隨時可以隨時通過點擊每個頁面下方的「Cookies 設置」連結來更改 Cookie 偏好。
有關我們使用 cookie 的更多詳細資訊,請參閱我們的 cookie 頁面

接受所有
配置