移至主內容

Featured Review: Home-based chemical bleaching of teeth in adults

This news item is more than 7 years old.
Image

Authors from Cochrane Oral Health asked the question, “What evidence is available regarding the different home-based chemically-induced bleaching agents in whitening teeth?” The recently published Cochrane Review is an update on a previous version, published in 2006.

There has been an increasing demand for whiter teeth. Home-based whitening products with a bleaching action have become popular and are available to patients from a dentist or purchased by patients themselves over-the-counter. A variety of whitening products are available which include:

  • hydrogen peroxide
  • carbamide peroxide
  • sodium percarbonate
  • sodium hexametaphosphate
  • sodium tripolyphosphate
  • calcium peroxide

These agents are supplied in different concentrations and are used with different methods of application (gel in tray, strips, paint-on gel, chewing gum, and mouthwash), which have varying application times and duration of treatment.

 The authors included 71 trials that involved 3,780 adults who underwent teeth whitening procedures with various bleaching agents using different methods of application, length of application and duration of treatment. 26 studies compared a bleaching agent to placebo and 51 studies compared one bleaching agent to another bleaching agent.

The referenced media source is missing and needs to be re-embedded.

Lead author, Prashanti Eachempati, said: “The bleaching agents whitened teeth compared to placebo over a short time period (from 2 weeks to 6 months). However, the evidence currently available is insufficient to draw reliable conclusions regarding the superiority of home-based bleaching compositions or any particular method of application or concentration or application time or duration of use. Well-planned randomised controlled trials need to be conducted by standardising methods of application, concentrations, application times and duration of treatment.”

“The overall certainty of the evidence was low to very low for all comparisons. This was because most of the comparisons were reported in single trials with small sample sizes and event rates. There was an unclear risk of bias in most of the trials."

Image

我們對Cookie的使用

我們使用必要的 cookie 使我們的網站正常運作。我們還希望設置可選擇分析的 cookie,以幫助我們進行改進網站。除非您啟用它們,否則我們不會設置可選擇的 cookie。使用此工具將在您的設備上設置 cookie,以記住您的偏好。您隨時可以隨時通過點擊每個頁面下方的「Cookies 設置」連結來更改 Cookie 偏好。
有關我們使用 cookie 的更多詳細資訊,請參閱我們的 cookie 頁面

接受所有
配置