跳转到主要内容

Wound drains in orthopaedic surgery (surgery on the joints or limbs)

Drainage systems may be used to drain fluid, mostly blood, from surgical wounds after an operation. The drains can either be open or closed. Closed drains use vacuum bottles and plastic conduits to draw fluid away from the wound by producing a negative pressure. They have been evaluated within trials for a number of elective and emergency orthopaedic operations. Closed surgical drainage systems reduce the need for reinforcement of the dressing and bruising around the wound, but increase the need for blood transfusion. Wound drains do not appear to have any effect on the occurrence of wound infections, large blood collections within the wound (haematomas), or the need for additional surgery to correct wound healing complications.

Closed suction wound drains in orthopaedic surgery are of doubtful benefit.

研究背景

Closed suction drainage systems are frequently used to drain fluids, particularly blood, from surgical wounds. The aim of these systems is to reduce the occurrence of wound haematomas and infection.

研究目的

To evaluate the effectiveness of closed suction drainage systems for orthopaedic surgery.

检索策略

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (March 2006), and contacted the Cochrane Wounds Group. We also searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 1), and MEDLINE (1966 to March 2006). Articles of all languages were considered.

纳入排除标准

All randomised or quasi-randomised trials comparing the use of closed suction drainage systems with no drainage systems for all types of elective and emergency orthopaedic surgery.

资料收集与分析

Two authors independently assessed trial quality, using a nine item scale, and extracted data. Where appropriate, results of comparable studies were pooled.

主要结果

Thirty-six studies involving 5464 participants with 5697 surgical wounds were identified. The types of surgery involved were hip and knee replacement, shoulder surgery, hip fracture surgery, spinal surgery, cruciate ligament reconstruction, open meniscectomy and fracture fixation surgery.

Pooling of results indicated no statistically significant difference in the incidence of wound infection, haematoma, dehiscence or re-operations between those allocated to drains and the un-drained wounds. Blood transfusion was required more frequently in those who received drains. The need for reinforcement of wound dressings and the occurrence of bruising were more common in the group without drains.

作者结论

There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials to support the routine use of closed suction drainage in orthopaedic surgery. Further randomised trials with larger patient numbers are required for different operations before definite conclusions can be made for all types of orthopaedic operations.

引用文献
Parker MJ, Livingstone V, Clifton R, McKee A. Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001825. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001825.pub2.

我们的Cookie使用

我们使用必要的cookie来使我们的网站工作。我们还希望设置可选的分析cookie,以帮助我们进行改进。除非您启用它们,否则我们不会设置可选的cookie。使用此工具将在您的设备上设置一个cookie来记住您的偏好。您随时可以随时通过单击每个页面页脚中的“Cookies设置”链接来更改您的Cookie首选项。
有关我们使用cookie的更多详细信息,请参阅我们的Cookies页面

接受全部
配置