Direkt zum Inhalt

Wound drains in orthopaedic surgery (surgery on the joints or limbs)

Auch verfügbar in

Drainage systems may be used to drain fluid, mostly blood, from surgical wounds after an operation. The drains can either be open or closed. Closed drains use vacuum bottles and plastic conduits to draw fluid away from the wound by producing a negative pressure. They have been evaluated within trials for a number of elective and emergency orthopaedic operations. Closed surgical drainage systems reduce the need for reinforcement of the dressing and bruising around the wound, but increase the need for blood transfusion. Wound drains do not appear to have any effect on the occurrence of wound infections, large blood collections within the wound (haematomas), or the need for additional surgery to correct wound healing complications.

Closed suction wound drains in orthopaedic surgery are of doubtful benefit.

Hintergrund

Closed suction drainage systems are frequently used to drain fluids, particularly blood, from surgical wounds. The aim of these systems is to reduce the occurrence of wound haematomas and infection.

Zielsetzungen

To evaluate the effectiveness of closed suction drainage systems for orthopaedic surgery.

Suchstrategie

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (March 2006), and contacted the Cochrane Wounds Group. We also searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 1), and MEDLINE (1966 to March 2006). Articles of all languages were considered.

Auswahlkriterien

All randomised or quasi-randomised trials comparing the use of closed suction drainage systems with no drainage systems for all types of elective and emergency orthopaedic surgery.

Datensammlung und ‐analyse

Two authors independently assessed trial quality, using a nine item scale, and extracted data. Where appropriate, results of comparable studies were pooled.

Hauptergebnisse

Thirty-six studies involving 5464 participants with 5697 surgical wounds were identified. The types of surgery involved were hip and knee replacement, shoulder surgery, hip fracture surgery, spinal surgery, cruciate ligament reconstruction, open meniscectomy and fracture fixation surgery.

Pooling of results indicated no statistically significant difference in the incidence of wound infection, haematoma, dehiscence or re-operations between those allocated to drains and the un-drained wounds. Blood transfusion was required more frequently in those who received drains. The need for reinforcement of wound dressings and the occurrence of bruising were more common in the group without drains.

Schlussfolgerungen der Autoren

There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials to support the routine use of closed suction drainage in orthopaedic surgery. Further randomised trials with larger patient numbers are required for different operations before definite conclusions can be made for all types of orthopaedic operations.

Zitierung
Parker MJ, Livingstone V, Clifton R, McKee A. Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001825. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001825.pub2.

So verwenden wir Cookies

Wir verwenden notwendige Cookies, damit unsere Webseite funktioniert. Wir möchten auch optionale Cookies für Google Analytics setzen, um unsere Webseite zu verbessern. Solche optionalen Cookies setzen wir nur, wenn Sie dies zulassen. Wenn Sie dieses Programm aufrufen, wird ein Cookie auf Ihrem Gerät platziert, um Ihre Präferenzen zu speichern. Sie können Ihre Cookie-Einstellungen jederzeit ändern, indem Sie auf den Link "Cookie-Einstellungen" am Ende jeder Seite klicken.
Auf unserer Seite zu Cookies finden Sie weitere Informationen, wie diese Cookies funktionieren die Seite mit den Cookies.

Alle akzeptieren
Anpassen