Przejdź do treści

Filtry

Dane naukowe

Podręcznik/instrukcje

Aktualności

Not enough evidence to give a second round of chemotherapy to patients with lung cancer in a poor state

Patients with lung cancer and a good physical condition who have not been cured by a first round of chemotherapy often receive a second round of chemotherapy (second-line). A second round of chemotherapy may not increase the survival chances of these patients and may make them feel worse because of bad side effects. This review has found only one study that compared the effects of a second round of chemotherapy with treatment showing no benefits for the patients, apart from keeping them comfortable. This study does not provide enough evidence to judge whether such treatment causes more benefits than harms and further larger studies are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.

Wprowadzenie

The role of second-line chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have relapsed or failed to respond to first-line treatment was unclear.

Cele

To determine the effectiveness of any second-line chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC.

Metody wyszukiwania badań

Medline (1966-July 2001), Embase (1974-July 2001), Cancerlit (1993-July) and tthe Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, issue 2 2001) were searched. In addition a handsearch was performed and experts in the field contacted to identify any further studies that had not been found by the electronic searches.

Kryteria doboru badań

Randomised controlled clinical trials in which any second-line chemotherapy was compared with placebo or best supportive care in patients with NSCLC who had failed to respond to any previous chemotherapy regimen.

Zbieranie i analiza danych

Data were extracted by 2 independent authors and revised by a third author.

Główne wyniki

Only one study was included. This study included a total of 204 patients who were randomised to receive either doxetaxel or best supportive care. Following an unacceptably high toxic death rate the dose of doxetaxel was reduced from 100 mg/m² to 75 mg/m². Docetaxel gave an extra 2.4 months survival - an average of 7.0 months vs 4.6 months on best supportive care. At 1 year after diagnosis 29% of doxetaxel treated patients were alive compared with 19% of the best supportive care group.

Wnioski autorów

Definitive recommendations cannot be made since evidence is only available from one randomised controlled trial which, though of reasonable quality had a number of limitations. There is currently no evidence to support second-line treatment of patients with poor performance status. Larger, well-designed controlled trials are needed to further evaluate whether the benefits of second-line chemotherapy to patients with non-small cell lung cancer outweigh its risks and costs.

Cytowanie
Bonfill Cosp X, Serra C, Sacristan M, Nogué M, Losa F, Montesinos J. Second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD002804. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002804.

Używamy plików cookie

Używamy niezbędnych plików cookie, aby nasza strona mogła działać. Chcielibyśmy również ustawić opcjonalne pliki cookie do analizy, aby pomóc nam udoskonalić tę stronę. Nie będziemy ustawiać opcjonalnych plików cookie, chyba że je włączysz. Użycie tego narzędzia spowoduje ustawienie pliku cookie na Twoim urządzeniu, aby zapamiętać Twoje preferencje. W każdej chwili możesz zmienić swoje preferencje dotyczące plików cookie, klikając na link "Ustawienia plików cookie" znajdujący się w stopce każdej strony.
Bardziej szczegółowe informacje na temat używanych przez nas plików cookie można znaleźć na naszej stronieStrona plików cookies

Zaakceptuj wszystkie
Skonfiguruj