メインコンテンツに移動

Interactive Learning

Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an Intervention Review

This content is available only in English

What systematic reviews are, why they are useful, framing a review question, process for reviews.

Why protocols are a crucial step, components of a protocol, framing eligibility criteria.

Why systematic and rigorous searches are important, planning and designing search strategies, sources of studies, managing and reporting the process.

How to select studies for inclusion, systematically collecting different data types that meet criteria.

What bias is, how to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials in different sources.

How to analyse different types of data, effect measures, undertaking meta-analysis, recognizing heterogeneity.

How to interpret results of statistical analysis, reporting bias, using GRADE method to report on certainty of evidence.

The reporting process, creating ‘Summary of findings’ tables, writing up results, discussing evidence, drawing conclusions, summary formats.

Introducing health economics and considerations for this in a systematic review.

Introduction to  network meta-analysis (NMA) in the context of a systematic review of randomized trials.

Putting the equity lens on your systematic review.

Getting started with qualitative evidence synthesis, taking stock of evidence, synthesising and developing findings and writing up a report.

How to conduct a rapid review, including key differences from systematic reviews and practical approaches to streamline the process.

Certificates

Download your certificates

4.7
3404 reviews
5 stars
79%
4 stars
14%
3 stars
3%
2 stars
1%
1 star
3%
Helpful (0)
Danilo C - 10 10月 2025
These modules fucking suck. I am doing them because I am mandated by my university, however it is just like "learning" a language on Duolingo. I do not understand the point of this besides selling universities an expensive license and masking it as an "internet course". The complete stupidity has made me, and an overwhelming majority of my course, skip to the end of the course and repeat the exam until we pass it. I would rate it zero or negative if possible, and hope my school stops paying for us to access this shit.

Have a nice day!
Thanks
Helpful (0)
Rogina J. S. S - 10 10月 2025
Very informative
Gunasekhar S - 9 10月 2025
Mariateresa G - 8 10月 2025
Anonymous - 7 10月 2025
Anonymous - 6 10月 2025
Helpful (1)
Sargon S - 6 10月 2025
Very insightful and easy for navigation
Deepakraj K - 6 10月 2025
Sarah M - 6 10月 2025
Pooja J - 6 10月 2025
Anonymous - 6 10月 2025
Anonymous - 5 10月 2025
Victor V - 4 10月 2025
Helpful (0)
Jhan Pieer M - 3 10月 2025
a
Helpful (0)
Anonymous - 3 10月 2025
The resources are good, but progress is often not accurately reflected. Even after passing the assessment, it still shows as 'partially completed,' and I’ve had to retake the assessment multiple times.
Hamdi A - 1 10月 2025
Helpful (0)
Catherine L - 1 10月 2025
I'm testing them out to see if they are suitable for my students who are doing a systematic review module.
Anonymous - 1 10月 2025
Omar M - 1 10月 2025
Anonymous - 29 9月 2025

Cookie の使用について

当サイトでは、当サイトを機能させるために必要なCookie を使用しています。また、任意のアナリティクスCookie を設定して改善に役立てたいと考えています。お客様がCookie を有効にしない限り、任意のCookie を設定することはありません。このツールを使用すると、あなたのデバイスにCookie を設定して、あなたの好みを記憶します。すべてのページのフッターにある「クッキー設定」リンクをクリックすることで、いつでもクッキーの設定を変更することができます。
使用するCookie の詳細については、Cookie のページを覧ください。

すべてを受け入れる
設定