In premature infants, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) associated with chronic lung disease (CLD) is associated with high mortality rate. With the exception of oxygen supplementation, no specific interventions have been established as an effective treatment for PAH in premature infants with CLD. Vasodilators could be effective treatments to reduce pulmonary arterial pressure, but little has been proven regarding their clinical effectiveness and concern remains regarding adverse effects. This review found no trials of the use of hydralazine for low birth weight infant with PAH related to CLD. However, since hydralazine is inexpensive and potentially beneficial, randomised controlled trials are recommended.
阅读完整摘要
Most deaths of infants with chronic lung disease (CLD) are caused by respiratory failure, unremitting pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) with cor pulmonale, or infection. Although the exact prevalence of PAH in infants with CLD is unknown, infants with CLD and severe PAH have a high mortality rate. Except for oxygen supplementation, no specific interventions have been established as effective in the treatment for PAH in premature infants with CLD. Little has been proven regarding the clinical efficacy of vasodilators and concerns remain regarding adverse effects.
研究目的
To review current evidence for the benefits and harms of hydralazine therapy to infants with persistent hypoxemic respiratory failure.
检索策略
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE via PubMed and EMBASE, and other clinical trials registries through November 2011 using the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. We searched these databases using a strategy combining a variation of the Cochrane highly sensitive search strategy for identifying randomised trials in MEDLINE; sensitivity-maximising version with selected MeSH and free-text terms: hydralazine, vasodilator agent, antihypertensive agent, heart diseases, lung diseases, respiratory tract diseases, infant, and randomised controlled trial.
纳入排除标准
We considered only randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials for inclusion. We included low birth weight (LBW) infants with persistent hypoxemic respiratory failure who were treated with any type of hydralazine therapy.
资料收集与分析
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality according to pre-specified criteria.
主要结果
We found no studies meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review.
作者结论
There was insufficient evidence to determine the safety and efficacy of hydralazine in LBW infants with persistent hypoxemic respiratory failure. Since hydralazine is inexpensive and potentially beneficial, randomised controlled trials are recommended. Such trials are particularly needed in settings where other medications such as sildenafil, inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are not available.
