跳转到主要内容

Giving magnesium maintenance therapy to women to prevent preterm birth after stopping threatened preterm labour

Magnesium does not reduce preterm birth or improve the outcome for the infant when given to women after contractions of preterm labour have been stopped.

Babies born preterm, before 37 weeks of pregnancy, may not survive or they may have later physical health and developmental problems if they do survive. Women whose preterm labour is stopped with tocolytic therapy (medication to reduce uterine contractions) remain at high risk of preterm birth. A variety of agents (tocolytics) are used to halt the uterine contractions. These include betamimetics, calcium channel blockers, magnesium sulphate, and oxytocin receptor antagonists. Subsequent tocolytic maintenance medication has been advocated. Oral and intravenous magnesium has been used to prevent further early contractions.

We included four randomised controlled trials involving a total of 422 women in this review. The trials did not demonstrate any differences between magnesium maintenance therapy and placebo or other treatments (ritodrine or terbutaline) in the prevention of preterm birth or perinatal deaths. The trials were too small to exclude either important benefits or harms from magnesium maintenance therapy. Magnesium was less likely than the alternative tocolytics (betamimetics) to result in side effects, particularly palpitations or tachycardia, although diarrhoea was more likely. This finding is based on very few studies of low quality, and none of them looked at the infants' later development.

研究背景

Magnesium maintenance therapy is one of the types of tocolytic therapy used after an episode of threatened preterm labour (usually treated with an initial dose of tocolytic therapy) in an attempt to prevent the onset of further preterm contractions.

研究目的

To assess whether magnesium maintenance therapy is effective in preventing preterm birth after the initial threatened preterm labour is arrested.

检索策略

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 January 2013).

纳入排除标准

Randomised controlled trials of magnesium therapy given to women after threatened preterm labour.

资料收集与分析

The review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction. We checked data entry.

主要结果

We included four trials involving 422 women. Three trials had high risk of bias and none included any long-term follow-up of infants. No differences in the incidence of preterm birth or perinatal mortality were seen when magnesium maintenance therapy was compared with placebo or no treatment; or alternative therapies (ritodrine or terbutaline). The risk ratio (RR) for preterm birth (less than 37 weeks) for magnesium compared with placebo or no treatment was 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.40 (two trials, 99 women); and 0.99, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.72 (two trials, 100 women) for magnesium compared with alternative therapies. The RR for perinatal mortality for magnesium compared with placebo or no treatment was 5.00, 95% CI 0.25 to 99.16 (one trial, 50 infants); and 5.00, 95% CI 0.25 to 99.16 (one trial, 50 infants) for magnesium compared with alternative treatments.

Women taking magnesium preparations were less likely to report side effects (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.96, three trials, 237 women), including palpitations or tachycardia (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.52, three trials, 237 women) than women receiving alternative therapies. Women receiving magnesium were however, more likely to experience diarrhoea (RR 6.79, 95% CI 1.26 to 36.72, three trials, 237 women).

作者结论

There is not enough evidence to show any difference between magnesium maintenance therapy compared with either placebo or no treatment, or alternative therapies (ritodrine or terbutaline) in preventing preterm birth after an episode of threatened preterm labour.

引用文献
Han S, Crowther CA, Moore V. Magnesium maintenance therapy for preventing preterm birth after threatened preterm labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2022, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD000940. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000940.pub3.

我们的Cookie使用

我们使用必要的cookie来使我们的网站工作。我们还希望设置可选的分析cookie,以帮助我们进行改进。除非您启用它们,否则我们不会设置可选的cookie。使用此工具将在您的设备上设置一个cookie来记住您的偏好。您随时可以随时通过单击每个页面页脚中的“Cookies设置”链接来更改您的Cookie首选项。
有关我们使用cookie的更多详细信息,请参阅我们的Cookies页面

接受全部
配置