Skip to main content

Interactive Learning

Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an Intervention Review

What systematic reviews are, why they are useful, framing a review question, process for reviews.

Why protocols are a crucial step, components of a protocol, framing eligibility criteria.

Why systematic and rigorous searches are important, planning and designing search strategies, sources of studies, managing and reporting the process.

How to select studies for inclusion, systematically collecting different data types that meet criteria.

What bias is, how to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials in different sources.

How to analyse different types of data, effect measures, undertaking meta-analysis, recognizing heterogeneity.

How to interpret results of statistical analysis, reporting bias, using GRADE method to report on certainty of evidence.

The reporting process, creating ‘Summary of findings’ tables, writing up results, discussing evidence, drawing conclusions, summary formats.

Introducing health economics and considerations for this in a systematic review.

Introduction to  network meta-analysis (NMA) in the context of a systematic review of randomized trials.

Putting the equity lens on your systematic review.

Getting started with qualitative evidence synthesis, taking stock of evidence, synthesising and developing findings and writing up a report.

How to conduct a rapid review, including key differences from systematic reviews and practical approaches to streamline the process.

Certificates

Download your certificates

4.7
3405 reviews
5 stars
79%
4 stars
14%
3 stars
3%
2 stars
1%
1 star
3%
domenica A - 3 February 2025
Samah Essam Saber M - 2 February 2025
Anonymous - 2 February 2025
Helpful (0)
Epipode N - 1 February 2025
What is the difference between Cochrane review proptocol and review proposal ?
Mentari Y - 31 January 2025
TANIA C - 30 January 2025
Mahdia B - 30 January 2025
Amy D - 30 January 2025
Helpful (0)
Kiran P - 30 January 2025
It is quite clear learning module
Helpful (0)
Anonymous - 30 January 2025
The test answers are so case sensitive, there has to be some flexibility in options In terms of case sensitiveness and alternatives acceptable
Alexandre Y - 30 January 2025
Courtney S - 29 January 2025
Anonymous - 29 January 2025
Amy M - 29 January 2025
Alejandro G - 29 January 2025
Helpful (0)
emma R - 28 January 2025
I liked the way it was broken up into manageable sections.
Johanna L - 28 January 2025
MARINA G - 28 January 2025
Helpful (0)
Marie H - 28 January 2025
Good overall content. It would be nice to know why a clinician would or should be interested in acquiring this knowledge and skill. I think the course should be taught in medical schools as a way to, at the beginning of physicians’ careers, get them interested and motivated to do systematic reviews.
Anonymous - 28 January 2025

Our use of cookies

We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set optional analytics cookies to help us improve it. We won't set optional cookies unless you enable them. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences. You can always change your cookie preferences at any time by clicking on the 'Cookies settings' link in the footer of every page.
For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies page.

Accept all
Configure