Direkt zum Inhalt

Laparoscopic and small-incision cholecystectomy seem equivalent in complications and recovery, but small-incision cholecystectomy is quicker to perform

Auch verfügbar in

The laparoscopic and the small-incision cholecystectomy are two alternative minimally invasive techniques for removal of the gallbladder. There are no significant differences in mortality and complications between the two minimal invasive procedures. The laparoscopic and the small-incision operation should be considered equal apart from a quicker operative time using the small-incision technique. The complications in both techniques are common.

Hintergrund

Cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations. Open cholecystectomy has been the gold standard for over 100 years. Small-incision cholecystectomy is a less frequently used alternative. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced in the 1980s.

Zielsetzungen

To compare the beneficial and harmful effects of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Suchstrategie

We searched TheCochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (6 April 2004),The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (1980 to January 2004), Web of Science (1988 to January 2004), and CINAHL (1982 to January 2004) for randomised trials.

Auswahlkriterien

All published and unpublished randomised trials in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis comparing any kind of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus small-incision or other kind of minimal incision open cholecystectomy. No language limitations were applied.

Datensammlung und ‐analyse

Two authors independently performed selection of trials and data extraction. The methodological quality of the generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, blinding, and follow-up was evaluated to assess bias risk. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle. Authors were requested additional information in case of missing data. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed if appropriate.

Hauptergebnisse

Thirteen trials randomised 2337 patients. Methodological quality was relatively high considering the four quality criteria. Total complications of laparoscopic and small-incision cholecystectomy are high: 26.6% versus 22.9%. Total complications (risk difference, random-effects -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.07 to 0.05), hospital stay (weighted mean difference (WMD), random-effects -0.72 days, 95% CI -1.48 to 0.04), and convalescence were not significantly different. High-quality trials show a quicker operative time for small-incision cholecystectomy (WMD, high-quality trials 'blinding', random-effects 16.4 minutes, 95% CI 8.9 to 23.8) while low-quality trials show no significant difference.

Schlussfolgerungen der Autoren

Laparoscopic and small-incision cholecystectomy seem to be equivalent. No differences could be observed in mortality, complications, and postoperative recovery. Small-incision cholecystectomy has a significantly shorter operative time. Complications in elective cholecystectomy are prevalent.

Zitierung
Keus F, de Jong J, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven C. Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006229. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006229.

So verwenden wir Cookies

Wir verwenden notwendige Cookies, damit unsere Webseite funktioniert. Wir möchten auch optionale Cookies für Google Analytics setzen, um unsere Webseite zu verbessern. Solche optionalen Cookies setzen wir nur, wenn Sie dies zulassen. Wenn Sie dieses Programm aufrufen, wird ein Cookie auf Ihrem Gerät platziert, um Ihre Präferenzen zu speichern. Sie können Ihre Cookie-Einstellungen jederzeit ändern, indem Sie auf den Link "Cookie-Einstellungen" am Ende jeder Seite klicken.
Auf unserer Seite zu Cookies finden Sie weitere Informationen, wie diese Cookies funktionieren die Seite mit den Cookies.

Alle akzeptieren
Anpassen