Direkt zum Inhalt

Y-set and double bag systems offer the most protection against peritonitis during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)

People with advanced kidney disease may be treated with CAPD where a catheter is permanently inserted into the peritoneum (lining around abdominal contents) through the abdominal wall and sterile fluid is drained in and out a few times each day. The most common serious complication is infection of the peritoneum - peritonitis. This may be caused by bacteria accidentally being transferred from the catheter. This review of trials compared three types of connecting systems (used to connect the bags and the catheter) and found the Y-set and double bag exchange systems are the most effective in preventing peritonitis.

Hintergrund

Peritonitis is the most frequent serious complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). It has a major influence on the number of patients switching from CAPD to haemodialysis and has probably restricted the wider acceptance and uptake of CAPD as an alternative mode of dialysis.

This is an update of a review first published in 2000.

Zielsetzungen

This systematic review sought to determine if modifications of the transfer set (Y-set or double bag systems) used in CAPD exchanges are associated with a reduction in peritonitis and an improvement in other relevant outcomes.

Suchstrategie

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Date of last search: 22 October 2013.

Auswahlkriterien

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing double bag, Y-set and standard peritoneal dialysis (PD) exchange systems in patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Datensammlung und ‐analyse

Data were abstracted by a single investigator onto a standard form and analysed by Review Manager. Analysis was by a random effects model and results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Hauptergebnisse

Twelve eligible trials with a total of 991 randomised patients were identified. Despite the large total number of patients, few trials covered the same interventions, small numbers of patients were enrolled in each trial and the methodological quality was suboptimal. Y-set and twin-bag systems were superior to conventional spike systems (7 trials, 485 patients, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.77) in preventing peritonitis in PD.

Schlussfolgerungen der Autoren

Disconnect systems should be the preferred exchange systems in CAPD.

Zitierung
Daly C, Cody JD, Khan I, Rabindranath KS, Vale L, Wallace SA. Double bag or Y-set versus standard transfer systems for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in end-stage kidney disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD003078. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003078.pub2.

So verwenden wir Cookies

Wir verwenden notwendige Cookies, damit unsere Webseite funktioniert. Wir möchten auch optionale Cookies für Google Analytics setzen, um unsere Webseite zu verbessern. Solche optionalen Cookies setzen wir nur, wenn Sie dies zulassen. Wenn Sie dieses Programm aufrufen, wird ein Cookie auf Ihrem Gerät platziert, um Ihre Präferenzen zu speichern. Sie können Ihre Cookie-Einstellungen jederzeit ändern, indem Sie auf den Link "Cookie-Einstellungen" am Ende jeder Seite klicken.
Auf unserer Seite zu Cookies finden Sie weitere Informationen, wie diese Cookies funktionieren die Seite mit den Cookies.

Alle akzeptieren
Anpassen