Przejdź do treści

Filtry

Dane naukowe

Podręcznik/instrukcje

Aktualności

Y-set and double bag systems offer the most protection against peritonitis during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)

People with advanced kidney disease may be treated with CAPD where a catheter is permanently inserted into the peritoneum (lining around abdominal contents) through the abdominal wall and sterile fluid is drained in and out a few times each day. The most common serious complication is infection of the peritoneum - peritonitis. This may be caused by bacteria accidentally being transferred from the catheter. This review of trials compared three types of connecting systems (used to connect the bags and the catheter) and found the Y-set and double bag exchange systems are the most effective in preventing peritonitis.

Wprowadzenie

Peritonitis is the most frequent serious complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). It has a major influence on the number of patients switching from CAPD to haemodialysis and has probably restricted the wider acceptance and uptake of CAPD as an alternative mode of dialysis.

This is an update of a review first published in 2000.

Cele

This systematic review sought to determine if modifications of the transfer set (Y-set or double bag systems) used in CAPD exchanges are associated with a reduction in peritonitis and an improvement in other relevant outcomes.

Metody wyszukiwania badań

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Date of last search: 22 October 2013.

Kryteria doboru badań

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing double bag, Y-set and standard peritoneal dialysis (PD) exchange systems in patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Zbieranie i analiza danych

Data were abstracted by a single investigator onto a standard form and analysed by Review Manager. Analysis was by a random effects model and results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Główne wyniki

Twelve eligible trials with a total of 991 randomised patients were identified. Despite the large total number of patients, few trials covered the same interventions, small numbers of patients were enrolled in each trial and the methodological quality was suboptimal. Y-set and twin-bag systems were superior to conventional spike systems (7 trials, 485 patients, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.77) in preventing peritonitis in PD.

Wnioski autorów

Disconnect systems should be the preferred exchange systems in CAPD.

Cytowanie
Daly C, Cody JD, Khan I, Rabindranath KS, Vale L, Wallace SA. Double bag or Y-set versus standard transfer systems for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in end-stage kidney disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD003078. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003078.pub2.

Używamy plików cookie

Używamy niezbędnych plików cookie, aby nasza strona mogła działać. Chcielibyśmy również ustawić opcjonalne pliki cookie do analizy, aby pomóc nam udoskonalić tę stronę. Nie będziemy ustawiać opcjonalnych plików cookie, chyba że je włączysz. Użycie tego narzędzia spowoduje ustawienie pliku cookie na Twoim urządzeniu, aby zapamiętać Twoje preferencje. W każdej chwili możesz zmienić swoje preferencje dotyczące plików cookie, klikając na link "Ustawienia plików cookie" znajdujący się w stopce każdej strony.
Bardziej szczegółowe informacje na temat używanych przez nas plików cookie można znaleźć na naszej stronieStrona plików cookies

Zaakceptuj wszystkie
Skonfiguruj