移至主內容

Interactive Learning

Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an Intervention Review

內容僅提供英文版本

What systematic reviews are, why they are useful, framing a review question, process for reviews.

Why protocols are a crucial step, components of a protocol, framing eligibility criteria.

Why systematic and rigorous searches are important, planning and designing search strategies, sources of studies, managing and reporting the process.

How to select studies for inclusion, systematically collecting different data types that meet criteria.

What bias is, how to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials in different sources.

How to analyse different types of data, effect measures, undertaking meta-analysis, recognizing heterogeneity.

How to interpret results of statistical analysis, reporting bias, using GRADE method to report on certainty of evidence.

The reporting process, creating ‘Summary of findings’ tables, writing up results, discussing evidence, drawing conclusions, summary formats.

Introducing health economics and considerations for this in a systematic review.

Introduction to  network meta-analysis (NMA) in the context of a systematic review of randomized trials.

Putting the equity lens on your systematic review.

Getting started with qualitative evidence synthesis, taking stock of evidence, synthesising and developing findings and writing up a report.

How to conduct a rapid review, including key differences from systematic reviews and practical approaches to streamline the process.

Certificates

Download your certificates

4.7
3402 reviews
5 stars
79%
4 stars
14%
3 stars
3%
2 stars
1%
1 star
3%
Germán José M - 17 八月 2021
Filippo L - 17 八月 2021
Helpful (1)
Zahraa H - 16 八月 2021
Amazing !
Thank you !
Helpful (0)
Anonymous - 15 八月 2021
The course is well-structured, clear and easy to navigate. Sometimes it is unclear what needs to be clicked for further information to complete the module. In the assessments, if more than two questions in the assessment are incorrect it can be difficult to remember which modules need reviewing. Being taken to a page with the modules that need to be reviewed would be helpful. Some questions are difficult to understand eg. Whether a study assessor is using the same outcome tool as the patient
Ahmad R - 14 八月 2021
Brenda Stefania P - 13 八月 2021
Alma C - 11 八月 2021
Anonymous - 11 八月 2021
Omar Ricardo D - 10 八月 2021
Seleno J - 9 八月 2021
Anonymous - 9 八月 2021
Helpful (1)
Amaya S - 7 八月 2021
The content was good but the distribution within the modules made it hard to retain information. It would be better if the Module's lessons could all be seen at a glance (like Wikipedia), with title, headings, subheadings, and content paragraphs. In this manner, one can choose to see all the information if one wishes to review or compare the text. The second part of the institute with the live lectures and powerpoints was much easier to go through.
Andrew L - 6 八月 2021
Ignacio M - 6 八月 2021
Anonymous - 5 八月 2021
Anonymous - 5 八月 2021
María José H - 4 八月 2021
Patricia K - 4 八月 2021
LUCY YANELA H - 4 八月 2021
andrea F - 4 八月 2021

我們對Cookie的使用

我們使用必要的 cookie 使我們的網站正常運作。我們還希望設置可選擇分析的 cookie,以幫助我們進行改進網站。除非您啟用它們,否則我們不會設置可選擇的 cookie。使用此工具將在您的設備上設置 cookie,以記住您的偏好。您隨時可以隨時通過點擊每個頁面下方的「Cookies 設置」連結來更改 Cookie 偏好。
有關我們使用 cookie 的更多詳細資訊,請參閱我們的 cookie 頁面

接受所有
配置