Progestin-only pills, as their name implies, contain just one hormone. The more common birth control pills combine two hormones. How these one-hormone pills compare to each other or to two-hormone pills is not clear. Hence, we did this review to compare progestin-only pills to other similar pills or to combined (two-hormone) pills. Through October 2013, we did a computer search and literature search to find randomized trials of progestin-only pills.
We found six trials for the initial review. We have not found any more studies since then. Some studies are several decades old and not very relevant to pills available today. A newer pill containing the progestin desogestrel may work better to prevent pregnancy than an older pill with levonorgestrel. The newer pill caused more bleeding problems. Pills with levonorgestrel may be more effective than pills with other progestins that are no longer used.
These studies are not adequate to tell how progestin-only pills compare to each other or to combined (two-hormone) pills. Larger studies with currently used pills are needed to answer these questions.
阅读完整摘要
The introduction of a new progestin-only oral contraceptive in Europe has renewed interest in this class of oral contraceptives. Unlike the more widely used combined oral contraceptives containing an estrogen plus progestin, these pills contain only a progestin (progestogen) and are taken without interruption. How these pills compare to others in their class or to combined oral contraceptives is not clear.
研究目的
This review examined randomized controlled trials of progestin-only pills for differences in efficacy, acceptability, and continuation rates.
检索策略
Through October 2013, we searched the computerized databases MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), POPLINE, and LILACS for studies of progestin-only pills. We also searched for current trials via ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. Previous searches also included EMBASE.
纳入排除标准
We included all randomized controlled trials in any language that included progestin-only pills for contraception. We incorporated any comparison with a progestin-only pill; this could include different doses, other progestin-only pills, combined oral contraceptives, or other contraceptives.
资料收集与分析
The first author abstracted the data and entered the information into RevMan 5. Another author performed a second, independent data abstraction to verify the initial data entry.
We attempted to extract life-table rates (actuarial or continuous) and used the rate difference as the effect measure. Where life-table rates were not published, we used the incidence rate ratio (ratio of Pearl rates). Where only the crude number of events was published, we calculated the Peto odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a fixed-effect model. For continuous variables, the mean difference (MD) was computed with 95% CI. Because of disparate exposures, we were not able to combine studies in meta-analysis.
主要结果
Six trials met the inclusion criteria. We have not found any new studies since the initial review. In the trial comparing the desogestrel versus levonorgestrel progestin-only pill, desogestrel was not associated with a significantly lower risk of accidental pregnancy; the rate ratio was 0.27 (95% CI 0.06 to 1.19). However, the desogestrel progestin-only pill caused more bleeding problems, although this difference was not statistically significant. The trial comparing low-dose mifepristone versus a levonorgestrel progestin-only pill found similar pregnancy rates. In the trial comparing ethynodiol diacetate versus a combined oral contraceptive, irregular cycles occurred in all women assigned to the progestin-only pill (odds ratio 135.96; 95% CI 7.61 to 2421.02). In a trial comparing two progestin-only and two combined oral contraceptives, the progestin-only pill containing levonorgestrel 30 μg had higher efficacy than did the pill containing norethisterone 350 μg. An early trial found megestrol acetate inferior to other progestin-only pills in terms of efficacy. A study of the timing of pill initiation after birth found no important differences, but high losses to follow up undermined the trial.
作者结论
Evidence is insufficient to compare progestin-only pills to each other or to combined oral contraceptives.
