Background
This is an updated version of an original Cochrane review published in Issue 6, 2014.
Pelvic lymphadenectomy (removal of lymph glands found in the pelvis) is an important component of the surgical management of gynaecological cancers to see if the cancer has spread. However, it can lead to complications, especially lymphocyst formation (collection of lymphatic fluid in the pelvis). Lymphocysts can cause leg swelling, blockage of the ureter (a tube that carries urine from the kidney to the urinary bladder), pelvic pain, clot formation in the leg and pelvic vein, bowel motility disorder, and infection. Without clear evidence for its effectiveness, placement of suction drains to remove lymphatic fluids that build up in the operative area between the peritoneum and the posterior abdominal wall has been traditionally recommended to prevent such complications.
Review question
The aim of this review was to compare the effects of drains versus no drains in preventing lymphocyst formation following pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Main findings
We updated the main database searches in March 2017. We identified four studies (571 women) for inclusion. The women primarily had cancer of the cervix and endometrium, with only one study also including women with cancer of the ovary. Our findings demonstrated that placement of suction drains is not effective in preventing lymphocysts, especially when the peritoneum (pelvic lining) is left open. In fact, such practice increases the risk of short- and long-term lymphocyst formation with related symptoms.
Quality of the evidence
The review includes four moderate to high quality evidence (unclear or low risk of bias) clinical trials in its final analysis.
Czytaj pełne streszczenie
Wprowadzenie
This is an updated version of an original Cochrane review published in Issue 6, 2014. Pelvic lymphadenectomy is associated with significant complications including lymphocyst formation and related morbidities. Retroperitoneal drainage using suction drains has been recommended as a method to prevent such complications. However, findings from recent studies have challenged this policy.
Cele
To assess the effects of retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy on lymphocyst formation and related morbidities in women with gynaecological cancer.
Metody wyszukiwania badań
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 3, 2017) in the Cochrane Library, electronic databases MEDLINE (1946 to March Week 2, 2017), Embase (1980 to 2017 week 12), and the citation lists of relevant publications. We also searched the trial registries for ongoing trials on 20 May 2017.
Kryteria doboru badań
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy in women with gynaecological cancer. Retroperitoneal drainage was defined as placement of passive or active suction drains in pelvic retroperitoneal spaces. No drainage was defined as no placement of passive or active suction drains in pelvic retroperitoneal spaces.
Zbieranie i analiza danych
We assessed studies using methodological quality criteria. For dichotomous data, we calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We examined continuous data using mean difference (MD) and 95% CI.
Główne wyniki
Since the last version of this review, we have identified no new studies for inclusion. The review included four studies with 571 women. Regarding short-term outcomes (within four weeks after surgery), retroperitoneal drainage was associated with a comparable rate of overall lymphocyst formation when all methods of pelvic peritoneum management were considered together (2 studies; 204 women; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.04 to 13.35; moderate-quality evidence). When the pelvic peritoneum was left open, the rates of overall lymphocyst formation (1 study; 110 women; RR 2.29, 95% CI 1.38 to 3.79) and symptomatic lymphocyst formation (2 studies; 237 women; RR 3.25, 95% CI 1.26 to 8.37) were higher in the drained group. At 12 months after surgery, the rates of overall lymphocyst formation were comparable between the groups (1 study; 232 women; RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.45; high-quality evidence). However, there was a trend toward increased risk of symptomatic lymphocyst formation in the group with drains (1 study; 232 women; RR 7.12, 95% CI 0.89 to 56.97; low-quality evidence).
Wnioski autorów
Placement of retroperitoneal tube drains has no benefit in the prevention of lymphocyst formation after pelvic lymphadenectomy in women with gynaecological malignancies. When the pelvic peritoneum is left open, the tube drain placement is associated with a higher risk of short- and long-term symptomatic lymphocyst formation. We found the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach to be moderate to high for most outcomes, except for symptomatic lymphocyst formation at 12 months after surgery, and unclear or low risk of bias.
