Przejdź do treści

Filtry

Dane naukowe

Podręcznik/instrukcje

Aktualności

Inhaled short-acting beta2-agonists versus ipratropium for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Także dostęne w

During an acute worsening of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, there may be a worsening in airway function. Two different types of drugs may be given as inhaled therapy to improve this: anticholinergic drugs such as ipratropium and beta2-agonists. These days the drugs of the latter type that are used for acute COPD are salbutamol and terbutaline, but neither of these drugs have been used in the only studies that we could find. We found only three small studies. Overall, both types of drug showed a small but worthwhile effect. There was no difference between them. Our review was not designed to test whether they would have had a greater effect if both were given at the same time.

Wprowadzenie

Inhaled short acting beta2 adrenergic agonists and ipratropium bromide are both used in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Cele

In patients with acute exacerbations of COPD to: 1. To assess the efficacy of short-acting beta-2 agonists against placebo ; 2. Compare the efficacy of short-acting beta-2 agonists and ipratropium.

Metody wyszukiwania badań

A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out of EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Cochrane COPD trials register was carried out using the terms: bronchodilator* OR albuterol OR metaproterenol OR terbutaline OR isoetharine OR pirbuterol OR salbutamol OR beta-2 agonist.

Kryteria doboru badań

All trials that appeared to be relevant were assessed by two reviewers who independently selected trials for inclusion. Differences were resolved by consensus.

Zbieranie i analiza danych

All trials that appeared to be relevant were assessed by two reviewers who independently selected trials for inclusion. Differences were resolved by consensus. References listed in each included trial were searched for additional trial reports. Trials were combined using Review Manager using a fixed effects model. The size of the treatment effects were tested for heterogeneity.

Główne wyniki

We identified no placebo-controlled comparisons of beta-2 agonists. Three studies permitted comparison of ipratropium to an inhaled beta-2 agonist. These studies included a total of 103 patients. The beta2-agonists used were: fenoterol and metaproterenol. One study was a parallel group trial of regular therapy for seven days. The other two were cross over studies of single dose treatments, with efficacy measured 90 min post dose. There was no washout period between treatments.

Both treatments produced an improvement in forced expiratory volume (FEV1) after 90 min in the range 150-250 ml. The was no difference between treatments, mean difference in FEV1 10 ml; 95% CI -220, 230 ml. In one small crossover study (n=10) there was a significant improvement in arterial PaO2 after 30 minutes with ipratropium (+5.8 mm Hg ± 3.0 (SEM)) compared to metaproterenol (-6.2 ± 1.2 mm Hg), but this was not significant at 90 min. There were no data concerning respiratory symptoms. The crossover studies showed no evidence of an additive effect of the two treatments, although they were not designed specifically to test this. An update search conducted in February 2002 yielded one further excluded study.

Wnioski autorów

There are few controlled trial data concerning the use of inhaled beta2-agonist agents in acute exacerbations of COPD and none that have compared these agents directly with placebo. None of the studies used the more modern beta2-agonists used most widely in this setting (salbutamol and terbutaline). Beta2-agonists and ipratropium both produce small improvements in FEV1, but beta2-agonists may worsen PaO2 for a period. We could not draw conclusions concerning possible additive effects.

Cytowanie
Brown CD, McCrory DC, White J. Inhaled short-acting beta2-agonists versus ipratropium for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD002984. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002984.

Używamy plików cookie

Używamy niezbędnych plików cookie, aby nasza strona mogła działać. Chcielibyśmy również ustawić opcjonalne pliki cookie do analizy, aby pomóc nam udoskonalić tę stronę. Nie będziemy ustawiać opcjonalnych plików cookie, chyba że je włączysz. Użycie tego narzędzia spowoduje ustawienie pliku cookie na Twoim urządzeniu, aby zapamiętać Twoje preferencje. W każdej chwili możesz zmienić swoje preferencje dotyczące plików cookie, klikając na link "Ustawienia plików cookie" znajdujący się w stopce każdej strony.
Bardziej szczegółowe informacje na temat używanych przez nas plików cookie można znaleźć na naszej stronieStrona plików cookies

Zaakceptuj wszystkie
Skonfiguruj