Langkau ke kandungan utama

Interactive Learning

Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an Intervention Review

Kandungan hanya tersedia dalam bahasa Inggeris

What systematic reviews are, why they are useful, framing a review question, process for reviews.

Why protocols are a crucial step, components of a protocol, framing eligibility criteria.

Why systematic and rigorous searches are important, planning and designing search strategies, sources of studies, managing and reporting the process.

How to select studies for inclusion, systematically collecting different data types that meet criteria.

What bias is, how to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials in different sources.

How to analyse different types of data, effect measures, undertaking meta-analysis, recognizing heterogeneity.

How to interpret results of statistical analysis, reporting bias, using GRADE method to report on certainty of evidence.

The reporting process, creating ‘Summary of findings’ tables, writing up results, discussing evidence, drawing conclusions, summary formats.

Introducing health economics and considerations for this in a systematic review.

Introduction to  network meta-analysis (NMA) in the context of a systematic review of randomized trials.

Putting the equity lens on your systematic review.

Getting started with qualitative evidence synthesis, taking stock of evidence, synthesising and developing findings and writing up a report.

How to conduct a rapid review, including key differences from systematic reviews and practical approaches to streamline the process.

Certificates

Download your certificates

4.7
3403 reviews
5 stars
79%
4 stars
14%
3 stars
3%
2 stars
1%
1 star
3%
Anonymous - 2 Februari 2025
Helpful (0)
Epipode N - 1 Februari 2025
What is the difference between Cochrane review proptocol and review proposal ?
Mentari Y - 31 Januari 2025
TANIA C - 30 Januari 2025
Mahdia B - 30 Januari 2025
Amy D - 30 Januari 2025
Helpful (0)
Kiran P - 30 Januari 2025
It is quite clear learning module
Helpful (0)
Anonymous - 30 Januari 2025
The test answers are so case sensitive, there has to be some flexibility in options In terms of case sensitiveness and alternatives acceptable
Alexandre Y - 30 Januari 2025
Courtney S - 29 Januari 2025
Anonymous - 29 Januari 2025
Amy M - 29 Januari 2025
Alejandro G - 29 Januari 2025
Helpful (0)
emma R - 28 Januari 2025
I liked the way it was broken up into manageable sections.
Johanna L - 28 Januari 2025
MARINA G - 28 Januari 2025
Helpful (0)
Marie H - 28 Januari 2025
Good overall content. It would be nice to know why a clinician would or should be interested in acquiring this knowledge and skill. I think the course should be taught in medical schools as a way to, at the beginning of physicians’ careers, get them interested and motivated to do systematic reviews.
Anonymous - 28 Januari 2025
Daniel Y - 27 Januari 2025
Helpful (0)
Lorna T - 27 Januari 2025
one broken link in the section on example of summary of findings incorporating equity issues - otherwise v interesting

Penggunaan cookie kami

Kami menggunakan cookie yang diperlukan untuk menjadikan laman web kami berfungsi. Kami juga ingin menetapkan cookie analitik pilihan untuk membantu kami memperbaikinya. Kami tidak akan menetapkan cookie pilihan melainkan anda mengaktifkannya. Menggunakan alat ini akan menetapkan cookie pada peranti anda untuk mengingati pilihan anda. Anda boleh menukar pilihan cookie anda pada bila-bila masa dengan menekan pautan 'Tetapan cookie' di bahagian bawah setiap halaman.
Untuk maklumat lebih terperinci mengenai cookie yang kami gunakan, lihat halaman halaman cookie.

Terima semua
Konfigurasikan