Aller au contenu principal

Endoscopic mucosal resection for early stomach cancer

There is a lack of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is compared with surgery for early stomach cancer. There is a need for well-designed randomised controlled trials to determine the effects of EMR compared to gastrectomy.

Contexte

The treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) using endoscopy, namely endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), has been adopted for about 20 years, but the effectiveness and safety of the modality are still controversial. Furthermore, the risk of bias of trials of this technique has not been assessed systematically.

Objectifs

The purpose of this review was to compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection with gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer.

Stratégie de recherche documentaire

Searches were conducted on the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) which includes the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group (UGPD) Trials Register (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2005), EMBASE (1980 to March 2005), CINAHL (1985 to March 2005) and CBM (Chinese BioMedical Database 1982 to 2002). The searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE were updated in February 2006, January 2009 and January 2011. Reference lists from trials selected by electronic searching were handsearched to identify further relevant trials. Published abstracts from conference proceedings from the United European Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published in Gastroenterology) were handsearched. Members of the Cochrane UGPD Group, and experts in the field were contacted and asked to provide details of outstanding clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials.

Critères de sélection

All randomised controlled trials of early gastric cancer patients involving a treatment arm of EMR and a comparison arm of gastrectomy were to be included, but no RCTs were found.

Recueil et analyse des données

The review authors independently assessed the eligibility of potential trials and extracted the data.

Résultats principaux

There were no randomised controlled trials identified for systematic review. Available evidence derived from non-randomised controlled trials is discussed in the main text of this review.

Conclusions des auteurs

There is a lack of randomised controlled trials in which endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is compared with gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. There is, therefore, a need for well-designed randomised controlled trials to determine the effects of EMR compared to gastrectomy.

Citation
Bennett C, Wang Y, Pan T. Endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004276. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004276.pub3.

Notre utilisation des cookies

Nous utilisons les cookies nécessaires au fonctionnement de notre site. Nous aimerions également mettre en place des cookies analytiques optionnels pour nous aider à l'améliorer. Nous n'installerons pas de cookies optionnels à moins que vous ne les activiez. L'utilisation de cet outil permettra d'installer un cookie sur votre appareil pour mémoriser vos préférences. Vous pouvez toujours modifier vos préférences en matière de cookies à tout moment en cliquant sur le lien « Paramètres des cookies » en bas de chaque page.
Vous pouvez voir plus d'informations concernant les cookies que nous utilisons sur notre page sur les Cookies

Accepter tout
Configurer