Direkt zum Inhalt

Interactive Learning

Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an Intervention Review

Inhalt nur auf Englisch verfügbar

What systematic reviews are, why they are useful, framing a review question, process for reviews.

Why protocols are a crucial step, components of a protocol, framing eligibility criteria.

Why systematic and rigorous searches are important, planning and designing search strategies, sources of studies, managing and reporting the process.

How to select studies for inclusion, systematically collecting different data types that meet criteria.

What bias is, how to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials in different sources.

How to analyse different types of data, effect measures, undertaking meta-analysis, recognizing heterogeneity.

How to interpret results of statistical analysis, reporting bias, using GRADE method to report on certainty of evidence.

The reporting process, creating ‘Summary of findings’ tables, writing up results, discussing evidence, drawing conclusions, summary formats.

Introducing health economics and considerations for this in a systematic review.

Introduction to  network meta-analysis (NMA) in the context of a systematic review of randomized trials.

Putting the equity lens on your systematic review.

Getting started with qualitative evidence synthesis, taking stock of evidence, synthesising and developing findings and writing up a report.

How to conduct a rapid review, including key differences from systematic reviews and practical approaches to streamline the process.

Certificates

Download your certificates

4.7
3403 reviews
5 stars
79%
4 stars
14%
3 stars
3%
2 stars
1%
1 star
3%
Helpful (1)
Anonymous - 9 Dezember 2021
It is useful for developing the methodology for medical device systematic reviews.
Helpful (6)
Elina D - 9 Dezember 2021
The assessment has very little value in terms of teaching. It is not set up for adult learning. The feedback on assessment should provide a more comprehensive answer. This was noted by a few others here. After someone attempts to answer one question 100 times and goes through the course, completing all other questions correctly, the assessment should provide a good explanation what is wrong with a given response, not simply say partly correct. Here it seems "computer says no" situation with very little teaching value.
Anonymous - 8 Dezember 2021
JOSÉ LUIS I - 7 Dezember 2021
Michael M - 7 Dezember 2021
Helpful (0)
Anonymous - 7 Dezember 2021
being tested on a list of what is in the study protocol is not useful
Daniel R - 6 Dezember 2021
Helpful (1)
Anonymous - 6 Dezember 2021
Clear and concise. Substantial resources. Interactive self-assessments and quizzes challenged my thinking. Appreciated the rationales being shared to clarify some concepts I understood but had misinterpreted the question.
Helpful (1)
Xu L - 6 Dezember 2021
excellent
Taha M - 5 Dezember 2021
Luis Armando V - 5 Dezember 2021
Neus C - 5 Dezember 2021
Hassan C - 4 Dezember 2021
Amanda P - 3 Dezember 2021
Helpful (1)
Anonymous - 2 Dezember 2021
The information is well organized and easy to understand
Helpful (0)
David J - 2 Dezember 2021
Being required to type in the PICO-Model only using the exact wording of the text does not contribute to understanding the Model.
Axel O - 2 Dezember 2021
Andres A - 1 Dezember 2021
Anonymous - 1 Dezember 2021
Lubin B - 30 November 2021

So verwenden wir Cookies

Wir verwenden notwendige Cookies, damit unsere Webseite funktioniert. Wir möchten auch optionale Cookies für Google Analytics setzen, um unsere Webseite zu verbessern. Solche optionalen Cookies setzen wir nur, wenn Sie dies zulassen. Wenn Sie dieses Programm aufrufen, wird ein Cookie auf Ihrem Gerät platziert, um Ihre Präferenzen zu speichern. Sie können Ihre Cookie-Einstellungen jederzeit ändern, indem Sie auf den Link "Cookie-Einstellungen" am Ende jeder Seite klicken.
Auf unserer Seite zu Cookies finden Sie weitere Informationen, wie diese Cookies funktionieren die Seite mit den Cookies.

Alle akzeptieren
Anpassen