|
The Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane Reviews |
| Explore | New + Updated | Other languages |
|
|
|
Anticonvulsant drugs for migraine prophylaxisChronicle EP, Mulleners WM SummaryAnticonvulsant drugs for migraine prophylaxisVarious medicines, collectively termed 'anticonvulsant drugs', are used to treat epilepsy. In recent years, some anticonvulsant drugs have also been used to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks. This review systematically examines the evidence supporting this practice. The authors conclude that anticonvulsant drugs are indeed effective in reducing the frequency of migraine attacks by approximately 1 to 2 attacks per month. Patients are also more than twice as likely to reduce the number of their migraine attacks by 50% or more with anticonvulsants than with an inactive placebo. There is, however, considerable variation among the available anticonvulsant drugs. Further research will be necessary to confirm the value of some drugs, and to compare the efficacy of drugs against each other.
This is a Cochrane review abstract and plain language summary, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010 Issue 1, Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).
This version first published online:
July 19. 2004 AbstractBackgroundAnticonvulsant drugs seem to be useful in clinical practice for the prophylaxis of migraine. This might be explained by a variety of actions of these drugs in the central nervous system. ObjectivesTo describe and assess the evidence from controlled trials on the efficacy and tolerability of anticonvulsants for preventing migraine attacks in adult patients with migraine. Search strategyWe searched PubMed (1966-December 2005), EMBASE (1974-December 2005) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 3, 2005), and handsearched Headache and Cephalalgia through April 2006. Selection criteriaStudies were required to be prospective, controlled trials of anticonvulsant drugs taken regularly to prevent the occurrence of migraine attacks and/or to reduce the intensity of those attacks. Data collection and analysisStudies were selected and data extracted by two independent reviewers. For migraine frequency data, standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for individual studies and pooled across studies. For dichotomous data on significant reduction in migraine frequency, odds ratios (ORs) and numbers-needed-to-treat (NNTs) were similarly calculated. Adverse events were analyzed by calculating numbers-needed-to-harm (NNHs) for studies using similar agents. Main resultsTwenty-three papers met the inclusion criteria. In total, data from 2927 patients were considered. Analysis of data from 10 trials (n = 902) demonstrates that anticonvulsants, considered as a class, reduce migraine frequency by about 1.3 attacks per 28 days as compared to placebo (WMD -1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.99 to -0.63). Data from 13 trials (n = 1773) show that anticonvulsants, considered as a class, also more than double the number of patients for whom migraine frequency is reduced by 50% or more relative to placebo (RR 2.25; 95% CI 1.79 to 2.84; NNT 3.9; 95% CI 3.4 to 4.7). For six trials of sodium valproate and divalproex sodium, NNHs for five clinically important adverse events ranged from 7.0 to 18.8. For six trials of topiramate, NNHs for seven adverse events (100 mg dose) ranged from 2.4 to 31.2. Authors' conclusionsAnticonvulsants appear to be both effective in reducing migraine frequency and reasonably well tolerated. There is noticeable variation among individual agents, but there are insufficient data to know whether this is due to chance or variation in true efficacy. Acetazolamide, clonazepam, lamotrigine and vigabatrin were not superior to placebo (one trial each). Relatively few robust trials are available for agents other than sodium valproate/divalproex sodium and topiramate; gabapentin in particular needs further evaluation. Trials designed with sufficient power to compare different drugs are also necessary. |