|
The Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane Reviews |
| Explore | New + Updated | Other languages |
|
|
|
Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal womenWells GA, Cranney A, Peterson J, Boucher M, Shea B, Robinson V, Coyle D, Tugwell P
. . . .
.
. . . .
Bookmark this:
loading... please wait
SummaryAlendronate for preventing fractures caused by osteoporosis in postmenopausal women This summary of a Cochrane review presents what we know from research about the effect of alendronate for preventing fractures (broken bones) caused by osteoporosis.
In women who have already been diagnosed with low bone density, putting them at risk for a fracture, or have already had a fracture in the bones of their spine, alendronate:
In women whose bone density is closer to normal, or who may not yet have had a fracture in the bones of their spine, alendronate:
We often do not have precise information about side effects and complications. This is particularly true for rare but serious side effects. Possible side effects may include digestive problems such as injury to the throat, esophagus and stomach and, less commonly, reduced blood supply to the jaw bone, which causes the bone tissue to break down.
What is osteoporosis and what is alendronate? Alendronate belongs to the class of drugs called bisphosphonates. It is a type of medication that slows down the cells that break down the old bone.
The best estimate of what happens to women that have already been diagnosed with low bone density, putting them at risk of a fracture, or have already had a fracture in the bones of their spine, who take alendronate:
The best estimate of what happens to women whose bone density is closer to normal, or who may not yet have had a fracture in the bones of their spine, who take alendronate:
This is a Cochrane review abstract and plain language summary, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008 Issue 3, Copyright © 2008 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).
This version first published online:
January 23. 2008 AbstractBackgroundOsteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration leading to increased fracture risk. Alendronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs, which act to inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts. ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy of alendronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Search strategyWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant randomized controlled trials published between 1966 to 2007. Selection criteriaWomen receiving at least one year of alendronate, for postmenopausal osteoporosis, were compared to those receiving placebo and/or concurrent calcium/vitamin D. The outcome was fracture incidence. Data collection and analysisWe undertook study selection and data abstraction in duplicate. We performed meta-analysis of fracture outcomes using relative risks and a > 15% relative change was considered clinically important. We assessed study quality through reporting of allocation concealment, blinding and withdrawals. Main resultsEleven trials representing 12,068 women were included in the review. Relative (RRR) and absolute (ARR) risk reductions for the 10 mg dose were as follows. For vertebral fractures, a significant 45% RRR was found (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.67). This was significant for both primary prevention, with 45% RRR (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.80) and 2% ARR, and secondary prevention with 45% RRR (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.69) and 6% ARR. For non-vertebral fractures, a significant 16% RRR was found (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.94). This was significant for secondary prevention, with 23% RRR (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.92) and 2% ARR, but not for primary prevention (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.04). There was a significant 40% RRR in hip fractures (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.92), but only secondary prevention was significant with 53% RRR (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.85) and 1% ARR. The only significance found for wrist was in secondary prevention, with a 50% RRR (RR 0.50 95% CI 0.34 to 0.73) and 2% ARR. For adverse events, we found no statistically significant differences in any included study. However, observational data raise concerns regarding potential risk for upper gastrointestinal injury and, less commonly, osteonecrosis of the jaw. Authors' conclusionsAt 10 mg per day, both clinically important and statistically significant reductions in vertebral, non-vertebral, hip and wrist fractures were observed for secondary prevention ('gold' level evidence, www.cochranemsk.org). We found no statistically significant results for primary prevention, with the exception of vertebral fractures, for which the reduction was clinically important ('gold' level evidence). |