Main navigation
-
About us
- What we do
-
Who we are
- Central Executive Team
-
Our groups
- Evidence Synthesis Unit Australia
- Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK
- Evidence Synthesis Unit Iberoamerica
- Evidence Synthesis Unit India
- Evidence Synthesis Unit Nigeria
- Acute and Emergency Care
- Global Ageing
- Health Equity
- Heart, Stroke and Circulation
- Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health
- Musculoskeletal Health and Pain
- Nutrition and Physical Activity
- People, Health Systems and Public Health
- Planetary Health
- Rehabilitation, Functioning, and Disability
- Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Work, Health and Social Security
- Governing Board
- Advisory Boards
- Our impact
- Our story
- News
- Jobs
- Events
- Our evidence
- Get involved
-
Learn
-
Courses and resources
-
Cochrane methodology
- Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an intervention review
- Diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) reviews
-
GRADE
- Introduction to GRADE
- Common errors: GRADE and interpretation of findings
- GRADE Handbook
- GRADE in Cochrane Handbook
- Incorporating GRADE in Cochrane Reviews
- Using GRADE and the GRADEpro GDT online software in your Cochrane Review [webinar]
- JCE series
- GRADE related publications
- Other publications by GRADE Working Group
- Methods and Statistics Tutorials
- Network meta-analysis (NMA)
- Risk of bias
- SWiM reporting guideline
- Systematic review of prognosis studies
- Conflict of Interest
- Editorial Essentials
- Getting started with evidence
-
Interactive Learning
- Module 1: Introduction to conducting systematic reviews
- Module 2: Writing the review protocol
- Module 3: Searching for studies
- Module 4: Selecting studies and collecting data
- Module 5: Introduction to risk of bias
- Module 6: Analysing the data
- Module 7: Interpreting the findings
- Module 8: Reporting the review
- Module 9: Introduction to health economics
- Module 10: Network meta-analysis
- Module 11: Health equity in systematic reviews
- Module 12: Introduction to qualitative evidence synthesis
- Patients and public involvement
- Software training
-
Cochrane methodology
-
Webinars
- Assessing and presenting the quality of evidence in ‘Summary of findings’ table
- Blogshots
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
- Cochrane Information Specialists' Handbook
- Commercial Sponsorship Policy
- Common Errors: A resource for Cochrane Editors
- Common errors in meta-analysis – lessons from the Cochrane review screening programme [webinar]
- Conflict of interest policy: Cochrane groups
- Core software
- Covidence webinar: Cochrane's new online tool for streamlined review production
- Defining a review question: trainers' materials
- Dissemination Essentials course materials
- Dissemination essentials: The checklist
- Entering and citing references in focused-format reviews
- Evaluating knowledge translation: How do we know we’re making a difference? Part 1: Tools to plan and evaluate your knowledge translation activities
- Evaluating knowledge translation: How do we know we’re making a difference? Part 2: Collecting and analysing feedback
- Exporting ‘Summary of findings’ table from GRADEpro GDT
- Finding out whether Cochrane is making a difference
- GRADE approach to rate the certainty of evidence from network meta-analysis and Summary of findings tables
- Getting to know EPPI-Reviewer [webinar]
- Good practice guidance for webinars and virtual workshops
- How to start a project in GRADEpro GDT
- Identifying Effective Components of Complex Interventions: Component network meta-analysis
- Introduction to GRADE and GRADEpro GDT
- Library of webinar recordings
- Online training for statistical editors and statisticians supporting Cochrane groups
- Organizing and updating outcomes in ‘Summary of findings’ table
- Practical issues in planning a Cochrane DTA Review
- Presenting a continuous outcome in ‘Summary of findings’ table
- Presenting a dichotomous outcome in ‘Summary of findings’ table
- Presenting narrative outcomes in ‘Summary of findings’ table
- Q&A on GRADE and ‘Summary of findings’ tables
- Review tools
- RoB 2.0: A revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials [webinar]
- Social Media
- Study centric data management and analysis
- Using GRADEpro to perform a GRADE assessment and make a summary of findings table
- Version and update control guide for Cochrane Handbook
- Writing a protocol: trainers' materials
-
Courses and resources
- Products and services
-
For authors
- Publish with us
-
Handbooks and manuals
- Methods peer review checklist: review
- Protocol pre-submission checklist
- Reporting search dates
-
Cochrane-Campbell Handbook for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
- QES_Chapter 20_REP_v0_061725
- QES_Chapter_11_MET_v0_231023
- QES_Chapter_12_VIS_v0_151223
- QES_Chapter_13_GRADE_CERQual_v0_120225
- QES_Chapter_14_INT_v0.1_140225
- QES_Chapter_15_TIM_v0_050724
- QES_Chapter_16_RER_v0_151124
- QES_Chapter_17_IMP_v0_240823
- QES_Chapter_18_QCA_v0_161023
- QES_Chapter_19_MN_CIS_MA_v0_110425
- QES_Chapter_21_PRE_v0_061123
- QES_Chapter_2_SCO_v0_151124
- QES_Chapter_3_SELT_v0_141223
- QES_Chapter_4_LOG_v0_161023
- QES_Chapter_5_SER_v0_240823
- QES_Chapter_6_SEL_v0_310524
- QES_Chapter_7_MET_v0_290424
- QES_Chapter_9_FRA_v0_250324
- Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
- Style Manual
- Screen4Me
- Editorial policies
- Author support
