Aller au contenu principal

Interactive Learning

Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an Intervention Review

Le contenu n'est disponible qu'en anglais

What systematic reviews are, why they are useful, framing a review question, process for reviews.

Why protocols are a crucial step, components of a protocol, framing eligibility criteria.

Why systematic and rigorous searches are important, planning and designing search strategies, sources of studies, managing and reporting the process.

How to select studies for inclusion, systematically collecting different data types that meet criteria.

What bias is, how to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials in different sources.

How to analyse different types of data, effect measures, undertaking meta-analysis, recognizing heterogeneity.

How to interpret results of statistical analysis, reporting bias, using GRADE method to report on certainty of evidence.

The reporting process, creating ‘Summary of findings’ tables, writing up results, discussing evidence, drawing conclusions, summary formats.

Introducing health economics and considerations for this in a systematic review.

Introduction to  network meta-analysis (NMA) in the context of a systematic review of randomized trials.

Putting the equity lens on your systematic review.

Getting started with qualitative evidence synthesis, taking stock of evidence, synthesising and developing findings and writing up a report.

How to conduct a rapid review, including key differences from systematic reviews and practical approaches to streamline the process.

Certificates

Download your certificates

4.7
3402 reviews
5 stars
79%
4 stars
14%
3 stars
3%
2 stars
1%
1 star
3%
Helpful (0)
Epipode N - 1 février 2025
What is the difference between Cochrane review proptocol and review proposal ?
Mentari Y - 31 janvier 2025
TANIA C - 30 janvier 2025
Mahdia B - 30 janvier 2025
Amy D - 30 janvier 2025
Helpful (0)
Kiran P - 30 janvier 2025
It is quite clear learning module
Helpful (0)
Anonymous - 30 janvier 2025
The test answers are so case sensitive, there has to be some flexibility in options In terms of case sensitiveness and alternatives acceptable
Alexandre Y - 30 janvier 2025
Courtney S - 29 janvier 2025
Anonymous - 29 janvier 2025
Amy M - 29 janvier 2025
Alejandro G - 29 janvier 2025
Helpful (0)
emma R - 28 janvier 2025
I liked the way it was broken up into manageable sections.
Johanna L - 28 janvier 2025
MARINA G - 28 janvier 2025
Helpful (0)
Marie H - 28 janvier 2025
Good overall content. It would be nice to know why a clinician would or should be interested in acquiring this knowledge and skill. I think the course should be taught in medical schools as a way to, at the beginning of physicians’ careers, get them interested and motivated to do systematic reviews.
Anonymous - 28 janvier 2025
Daniel Y - 27 janvier 2025
Helpful (0)
Lorna T - 27 janvier 2025
one broken link in the section on example of summary of findings incorporating equity issues - otherwise v interesting
FatemehZahra D - 27 janvier 2025

Notre utilisation des cookies

Nous utilisons les cookies nécessaires au fonctionnement de notre site. Nous aimerions également mettre en place des cookies analytiques optionnels pour nous aider à l'améliorer. Nous n'installerons pas de cookies optionnels à moins que vous ne les activiez. L'utilisation de cet outil permettra d'installer un cookie sur votre appareil pour mémoriser vos préférences. Vous pouvez toujours modifier vos préférences en matière de cookies à tout moment en cliquant sur le lien « Paramètres des cookies » en bas de chaque page.
Vous pouvez voir plus d'informations concernant les cookies que nous utilisons sur notre page sur les Cookies

Accepter tout
Configurer