Aller au contenu principal

Interactive Learning

Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an Intervention Review

Le contenu n'est disponible qu'en anglais

What systematic reviews are, why they are useful, framing a review question, process for reviews.

Why protocols are a crucial step, components of a protocol, framing eligibility criteria.

Why systematic and rigorous searches are important, planning and designing search strategies, sources of studies, managing and reporting the process.

How to select studies for inclusion, systematically collecting different data types that meet criteria.

What bias is, how to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials in different sources.

How to analyse different types of data, effect measures, undertaking meta-analysis, recognizing heterogeneity.

How to interpret results of statistical analysis, reporting bias, using GRADE method to report on certainty of evidence.

The reporting process, creating ‘Summary of findings’ tables, writing up results, discussing evidence, drawing conclusions, summary formats.

Introducing health economics and considerations for this in a systematic review.

Introduction to  network meta-analysis (NMA) in the context of a systematic review of randomized trials.

Putting the equity lens on your systematic review.

Getting started with qualitative evidence synthesis, taking stock of evidence, synthesising and developing findings and writing up a report.

How to conduct a rapid review, including key differences from systematic reviews and practical approaches to streamline the process.

Certificates

Download your certificates

4.7
3403 reviews
5 stars
79%
4 stars
14%
3 stars
3%
2 stars
1%
1 star
3%
Kevyn F - 17 août 2021
Germán José M - 17 août 2021
Filippo L - 17 août 2021
Helpful (1)
Zahraa H - 16 août 2021
Amazing !
Thank you !
Helpful (0)
Anonymous - 15 août 2021
The course is well-structured, clear and easy to navigate. Sometimes it is unclear what needs to be clicked for further information to complete the module. In the assessments, if more than two questions in the assessment are incorrect it can be difficult to remember which modules need reviewing. Being taken to a page with the modules that need to be reviewed would be helpful. Some questions are difficult to understand eg. Whether a study assessor is using the same outcome tool as the patient
Ahmad R - 14 août 2021
Brenda Stefania P - 13 août 2021
Alma C - 11 août 2021
Anonymous - 11 août 2021
Omar Ricardo D - 10 août 2021
Seleno J - 9 août 2021
Anonymous - 9 août 2021
Helpful (1)
Amaya S - 7 août 2021
The content was good but the distribution within the modules made it hard to retain information. It would be better if the Module's lessons could all be seen at a glance (like Wikipedia), with title, headings, subheadings, and content paragraphs. In this manner, one can choose to see all the information if one wishes to review or compare the text. The second part of the institute with the live lectures and powerpoints was much easier to go through.
Andrew L - 6 août 2021
Ignacio M - 6 août 2021
Anonymous - 5 août 2021
Anonymous - 5 août 2021
María José H - 4 août 2021
Patricia K - 4 août 2021
LUCY YANELA H - 4 août 2021

Notre utilisation des cookies

Nous utilisons les cookies nécessaires au fonctionnement de notre site. Nous aimerions également mettre en place des cookies analytiques optionnels pour nous aider à l'améliorer. Nous n'installerons pas de cookies optionnels à moins que vous ne les activiez. L'utilisation de cet outil permettra d'installer un cookie sur votre appareil pour mémoriser vos préférences. Vous pouvez toujours modifier vos préférences en matière de cookies à tout moment en cliquant sur le lien « Paramètres des cookies » en bas de chaque page.
Vous pouvez voir plus d'informations concernant les cookies que nous utilisons sur notre page sur les Cookies

Accepter tout
Configurer