رفتن به محتوای اصلی

Interactive Learning

Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an Intervention Review

محتوا فقط به زبان انگلیسی در دسترس است

What systematic reviews are, why they are useful, framing a review question, process for reviews.

Why protocols are a crucial step, components of a protocol, framing eligibility criteria.

Why systematic and rigorous searches are important, planning and designing search strategies, sources of studies, managing and reporting the process.

How to select studies for inclusion, systematically collecting different data types that meet criteria.

What bias is, how to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials in different sources.

How to analyse different types of data, effect measures, undertaking meta-analysis, recognizing heterogeneity.

How to interpret results of statistical analysis, reporting bias, using GRADE method to report on certainty of evidence.

The reporting process, creating ‘Summary of findings’ tables, writing up results, discussing evidence, drawing conclusions, summary formats.

Introducing health economics and considerations for this in a systematic review.

Introduction to  network meta-analysis (NMA) in the context of a systematic review of randomized trials.

Putting the equity lens on your systematic review.

Getting started with qualitative evidence synthesis, taking stock of evidence, synthesising and developing findings and writing up a report.

How to conduct a rapid review, including key differences from systematic reviews and practical approaches to streamline the process.

Certificates

Download your certificates

4.7
3402 reviews
5 stars
79%
4 stars
14%
3 stars
3%
2 stars
1%
1 star
3%
Helpful (0)
Epipode N - 1 فوریه 2025
What is the difference between Cochrane review proptocol and review proposal ?
Mentari Y - 31 ژانویه 2025
TANIA C - 30 ژانویه 2025
Mahdia B - 30 ژانویه 2025
Amy D - 30 ژانویه 2025
Helpful (0)
Kiran P - 30 ژانویه 2025
It is quite clear learning module
Helpful (0)
Anonymous - 30 ژانویه 2025
The test answers are so case sensitive, there has to be some flexibility in options In terms of case sensitiveness and alternatives acceptable
Alexandre Y - 30 ژانویه 2025
Courtney S - 29 ژانویه 2025
Anonymous - 29 ژانویه 2025
Amy M - 29 ژانویه 2025
Alejandro G - 29 ژانویه 2025
Helpful (0)
emma R - 28 ژانویه 2025
I liked the way it was broken up into manageable sections.
Johanna L - 28 ژانویه 2025
MARINA G - 28 ژانویه 2025
Helpful (0)
Marie H - 28 ژانویه 2025
Good overall content. It would be nice to know why a clinician would or should be interested in acquiring this knowledge and skill. I think the course should be taught in medical schools as a way to, at the beginning of physicians’ careers, get them interested and motivated to do systematic reviews.
Anonymous - 28 ژانویه 2025
Daniel Y - 27 ژانویه 2025
Helpful (0)
Lorna T - 27 ژانویه 2025
one broken link in the section on example of summary of findings incorporating equity issues - otherwise v interesting
FatemehZahra D - 27 ژانویه 2025

استفاده ما از cookie‌ها

ما برای کارکردن وب‌گاه از cookie‌های لازم استفاده می‌کنیم. ما همچنین می‌خواهیم cookie‌های تجزیه و تحلیل اختیاری تنظیم کنیم تا به ما در بهبود آن کمک کند. ما cookie‌های اختیاری را تنظیم نمی کنیم، مگر این‌که آنها را فعال کنید. با استفاده از این ابزار یک cookie‌ روی دستگاه شما تنظیم می‌شود تا تنظیمات منتخب شما را به خاطر بسپارد. همیشه می‌توانید با کلیک بر روی پیوند «تنظیمات Cookies» در پایین هر صفحه، تنظیمات cookie‌ خود را تغییر دهید.
برای اطلاعات بیشتر در مورد cookie‌هایی که استفاده می‌کنیم، صفحه cookie‌های ما را ملاحظه کنید.

پذیرش تمامی موارد
پیکربندی کنید