رفتن به محتوای اصلی

Interactive Learning

Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an Intervention Review

محتوا فقط به زبان انگلیسی در دسترس است

What systematic reviews are, why they are useful, framing a review question, process for reviews.

Why protocols are a crucial step, components of a protocol, framing eligibility criteria.

Why systematic and rigorous searches are important, planning and designing search strategies, sources of studies, managing and reporting the process.

How to select studies for inclusion, systematically collecting different data types that meet criteria.

What bias is, how to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials in different sources.

How to analyse different types of data, effect measures, undertaking meta-analysis, recognizing heterogeneity.

How to interpret results of statistical analysis, reporting bias, using GRADE method to report on certainty of evidence.

The reporting process, creating ‘Summary of findings’ tables, writing up results, discussing evidence, drawing conclusions, summary formats.

Introducing health economics and considerations for this in a systematic review.

Introduction to  network meta-analysis (NMA) in the context of a systematic review of randomized trials.

Putting the equity lens on your systematic review.

Getting started with qualitative evidence synthesis, taking stock of evidence, synthesising and developing findings and writing up a report.

How to conduct a rapid review, including key differences from systematic reviews and practical approaches to streamline the process.

Certificates

Download your certificates

4.7
3402 reviews
5 stars
79%
4 stars
14%
3 stars
3%
2 stars
1%
1 star
3%
Helpful (6)
Elina D - 9 دسامبر 2021
The assessment has very little value in terms of teaching. It is not set up for adult learning. The feedback on assessment should provide a more comprehensive answer. This was noted by a few others here. After someone attempts to answer one question 100 times and goes through the course, completing all other questions correctly, the assessment should provide a good explanation what is wrong with a given response, not simply say partly correct. Here it seems "computer says no" situation with very little teaching value.
Anonymous - 8 دسامبر 2021
JOSÉ LUIS I - 7 دسامبر 2021
Michael M - 7 دسامبر 2021
Helpful (0)
Anonymous - 7 دسامبر 2021
being tested on a list of what is in the study protocol is not useful
Daniel R - 6 دسامبر 2021
Helpful (1)
Anonymous - 6 دسامبر 2021
Clear and concise. Substantial resources. Interactive self-assessments and quizzes challenged my thinking. Appreciated the rationales being shared to clarify some concepts I understood but had misinterpreted the question.
Helpful (1)
Xu L - 6 دسامبر 2021
excellent
Taha M - 5 دسامبر 2021
Luis Armando V - 5 دسامبر 2021
Neus C - 5 دسامبر 2021
Hassan C - 4 دسامبر 2021
Amanda P - 3 دسامبر 2021
Helpful (1)
Anonymous - 2 دسامبر 2021
The information is well organized and easy to understand
Helpful (0)
David J - 2 دسامبر 2021
Being required to type in the PICO-Model only using the exact wording of the text does not contribute to understanding the Model.
Axel O - 2 دسامبر 2021
Andres A - 1 دسامبر 2021
Anonymous - 1 دسامبر 2021
Lubin B - 30 نوامبر 2021
Helpful (0)
Janette F - 30 نوامبر 2021
I am not entirely new to the theory of systematic reviewing but this course has really deepened my knowledge. I wouldn't change much but perhaps a few more videos of reviewers in action would help us learn.

استفاده ما از cookie‌ها

ما برای کارکردن وب‌گاه از cookie‌های لازم استفاده می‌کنیم. ما همچنین می‌خواهیم cookie‌های تجزیه و تحلیل اختیاری تنظیم کنیم تا به ما در بهبود آن کمک کند. ما cookie‌های اختیاری را تنظیم نمی کنیم، مگر این‌که آنها را فعال کنید. با استفاده از این ابزار یک cookie‌ روی دستگاه شما تنظیم می‌شود تا تنظیمات منتخب شما را به خاطر بسپارد. همیشه می‌توانید با کلیک بر روی پیوند «تنظیمات Cookies» در پایین هر صفحه، تنظیمات cookie‌ خود را تغییر دهید.
برای اطلاعات بیشتر در مورد cookie‌هایی که استفاده می‌کنیم، صفحه cookie‌های ما را ملاحظه کنید.

پذیرش تمامی موارد
پیکربندی کنید