移至主內容

Still not clear whether people with a spinal cord injury should go straight to a specialist centre

亦提供以下語言

Spinal cord injury is a serious condition and the effects are usually permanent. In several countries, specialist centres have been set up, where patients can be taken within a few hours of their injury, but even in these countries many patients are dealt with in non-specialist hospitals. This review tried to answer the question: does immediate referral to an SIC result in a better outcome than delayed referral? However, a comprehensive search failed to find any controlled studies and so it is not yet possible to answer the question. The reviewers call for appropriate research to be done.

背景

The majority of complications in traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) can occur in the first 24 hours and it has been suggested that spinal injury centres (SICs) may influence the pre-transfer care of people with SCI. The specialist SIC concept has been adopted in a number of high-income countries. However, even in such countries, a potentially significant number of people with SCI do not have the opportunity to access this system and are managed in a non-specialist environment.

目的

To answer the question: does immediate referral to an SIC result in a better outcome than delayed referral?

搜尋策略

The following databases were searched: AMED, CCTR, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, HEED, HMIC, MEDLINE, NRR, NHS EED, and PsycLIT. Searches were updated in May 2003 and included the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialist Register. The reference lists of retrieved articles were checked.

選擇標準

Randomised controlled trials and controlled trials that compared immediate referral to an SIC with delayed referral in patients with a traumatic SCI.

資料收集與分析

Two reviewers independently selected studies. One reviewer was to have assessed the quality of the studies and extracted data.

主要結果

No randomised controlled trials or controlled trials were identified that compared immediate referral to an SIC with delayed referral in patients with a traumatic SCI. All of the studies identified were retrospective observational studies and of poor quality.

作者結論

The current evidence does not enable conclusions to be drawn about the benefits or disadvantages of immediate referral versus late referral to SICs. Well-designed, prospective experimental studies with appropriately matched controls are needed.

引用文獻
Jones L, Bagnall A-M. Spinal injuries centres (SICs) for acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004442. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004442.pub2.

我們對Cookie的使用

我們使用必要的 cookie 使我們的網站正常運作。我們還希望設置可選擇分析的 cookie,以幫助我們進行改進網站。除非您啟用它們,否則我們不會設置可選擇的 cookie。使用此工具將在您的設備上設置 cookie,以記住您的偏好。您隨時可以隨時通過點擊每個頁面下方的「Cookies 設置」連結來更改 Cookie 偏好。
有關我們使用 cookie 的更多詳細資訊,請參閱我們的 cookie 頁面

接受所有
配置