移至主內容

Interactive Learning

Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an Intervention Review

內容僅提供英文版本

What systematic reviews are, why they are useful, framing a review question, process for reviews.

Why protocols are a crucial step, components of a protocol, framing eligibility criteria.

Why systematic and rigorous searches are important, planning and designing search strategies, sources of studies, managing and reporting the process.

How to select studies for inclusion, systematically collecting different data types that meet criteria.

What bias is, how to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials in different sources.

How to analyse different types of data, effect measures, undertaking meta-analysis, recognizing heterogeneity.

How to interpret results of statistical analysis, reporting bias, using GRADE method to report on certainty of evidence.

The reporting process, creating ‘Summary of findings’ tables, writing up results, discussing evidence, drawing conclusions, summary formats.

Introducing health economics and considerations for this in a systematic review.

Introduction to  network meta-analysis (NMA) in the context of a systematic review of randomized trials.

Putting the equity lens on your systematic review.

Getting started with qualitative evidence synthesis, taking stock of evidence, synthesising and developing findings and writing up a report.

How to conduct a rapid review, including key differences from systematic reviews and practical approaches to streamline the process.

Certificates

Download your certificates

4.7
3402 reviews
5 stars
79%
4 stars
14%
3 stars
3%
2 stars
1%
1 star
3%
Helpful (6)
Elina D - 9 十二月 2021
The assessment has very little value in terms of teaching. It is not set up for adult learning. The feedback on assessment should provide a more comprehensive answer. This was noted by a few others here. After someone attempts to answer one question 100 times and goes through the course, completing all other questions correctly, the assessment should provide a good explanation what is wrong with a given response, not simply say partly correct. Here it seems "computer says no" situation with very little teaching value.
Anonymous - 8 十二月 2021
JOSÉ LUIS I - 7 十二月 2021
Michael M - 7 十二月 2021
Helpful (0)
Anonymous - 7 十二月 2021
being tested on a list of what is in the study protocol is not useful
Daniel R - 6 十二月 2021
Helpful (1)
Anonymous - 6 十二月 2021
Clear and concise. Substantial resources. Interactive self-assessments and quizzes challenged my thinking. Appreciated the rationales being shared to clarify some concepts I understood but had misinterpreted the question.
Helpful (1)
Xu L - 6 十二月 2021
excellent
Taha M - 5 十二月 2021
Luis Armando V - 5 十二月 2021
Neus C - 5 十二月 2021
Hassan C - 4 十二月 2021
Amanda P - 3 十二月 2021
Helpful (1)
Anonymous - 2 十二月 2021
The information is well organized and easy to understand
Helpful (0)
David J - 2 十二月 2021
Being required to type in the PICO-Model only using the exact wording of the text does not contribute to understanding the Model.
Axel O - 2 十二月 2021
Andres A - 1 十二月 2021
Anonymous - 1 十二月 2021
Lubin B - 30 十一月 2021
Helpful (0)
Janette F - 30 十一月 2021
I am not entirely new to the theory of systematic reviewing but this course has really deepened my knowledge. I wouldn't change much but perhaps a few more videos of reviewers in action would help us learn.

我們對Cookie的使用

我們使用必要的 cookie 使我們的網站正常運作。我們還希望設置可選擇分析的 cookie,以幫助我們進行改進網站。除非您啟用它們,否則我們不會設置可選擇的 cookie。使用此工具將在您的設備上設置 cookie,以記住您的偏好。您隨時可以隨時通過點擊每個頁面下方的「Cookies 設置」連結來更改 Cookie 偏好。
有關我們使用 cookie 的更多詳細資訊,請參閱我們的 cookie 頁面

接受所有
配置