移至主內容

How well are Cochrane reviews incorporating non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSI)? Lessons learnt from a scoping review

Event date
- (10:00 - 11:00 GMT)


 

Image
Learning Live. Methods Support Unit Web Clinic. A monthly web clinic for Cochrane authors, editors and staff

In this web clinic, the presenter discussed the findings from a recent scoping review which investigated how Cochrane authors have incorporated evidence from NRSI in their reviews, and whether this has changed over time.

The scoping review aimed to look at how well Cochrane authors adhered to Cochrane handbook guidance, the methods used to analyse NRSI data (especially in addition to RCTs), how NRSI evidence was incorporated into Summary of Findings (SoF) tables, and which risk of bias tools were used.

This session was delivered in February 2025 and below you will find the videos from the webinar, together with the accompanying slides to download [PDF]. Recordings from other Methods Support Unit web clinics are available here


Presenter Bio

Emma Axon, Evidence Synthesis Methodology Editor, Methods Support Unit, Cochrane. Emma has a MSc in Epidemiology and Biostatistics and has been involved as an author on several Cochrane reviews assessing interventions to treat childhood obesity, which she completed during her PhD. Emma has also worked as a systematic review methodologist for Cochrane Skin, based at the University of Nottingham, conducting editorial assessments, and providing methods support to author teams. She also co-authored several Cochrane reviews as part of this role. Emma now works as an Evidence Synthesis Methodology Editor for the Cochrane Methods Support Unit. Her main research interests encompass general systematic review methods, such as implementing risk of bias and GRADE assessments.

我們對Cookie的使用

我們使用必要的 cookie 使我們的網站正常運作。我們還希望設置可選擇分析的 cookie,以幫助我們進行改進網站。除非您啟用它們,否則我們不會設置可選擇的 cookie。使用此工具將在您的設備上設置 cookie,以記住您的偏好。您隨時可以隨時通過點擊每個頁面下方的「Cookies 設置」連結來更改 Cookie 偏好。
有關我們使用 cookie 的更多詳細資訊,請參閱我們的 cookie 頁面

接受所有
配置