|
The Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane Reviews |
| Explore | New + Updated | Other languages |
|
|
|
Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infectionTanner J, Woodings D, Moncaster K SummaryPreoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection.Traditionally people undergoing surgery have body hair removed from the intended surgical wound site as this is thought to reduce the chance of the surgical site becoming infected. Three methods of hair removal are currently used; shaving with a razor, clipping with clippers and using a cream which dissolves the hair. When people are being prepared for surgery removing body hair from the area of the surgical incision may reduce the chance of the surgical site becoming infected. Hair removal using a cream results in fewer surgical site infections than shaving. However if it is necessary to remove hair then it is preferable to use clippers rather than shaving with a razor as this results in fewer surgical site infections.
This is a Cochrane review abstract and plain language summary, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009 Issue 4, Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).
This version first published online:
April 19. 2006 AbstractBackgroundThe preparation of people for surgery has traditionally included the routine removal of body hair from the intended surgical wound site. However, there are studies which claim that pre-operative hair removal is deleterious to patients, perhaps by causing surgical site infections (SSIs), and should not be carried out. ObjectivesThe primary objective of this review was to determine if routine pre-operative hair removal results in fewer SSIs than not removing hair. Search strategyThe reviewers searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (October 2005), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to 2005), EMBASE (1980 to 2005), CINAHL (1982 to 2005), and the ZETOC database of conference proceedings (1993 to 2005). We also contacted manufacturers of hair removal products. Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing hair removal with no hair removal, different methods of hair removal, hair removal conducted at different times prior to surgery and hair removal carried out in different settings. Data collection and analysisThree authors independently assessed the relevance and quality of each trial. Data was extracted independently by one author and cross checked for accuracy by a second author. Main results
One trial compared shaving on the day of surgery with shaving the day before surgery and one trial compared clipping on the day of surgery with clipping the day before surgery; neither trial found a statistically significant difference in the number of SSIs. No trials were found that compared depilatory cream at different times or that compared hair removal in different settings. Authors' conclusionsThe evidence finds no difference in SSIs among patients who have had hair removed prior to surgery and those who have not. If it is necessary to remove hair then both clipping and depilatory creams results in fewer SSIs than shaving using a razor. There is no difference in SSIs when patients are shaved or clipped one day before surgery or on the day of surgery. |