|
The Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane Reviews |
| Explore | New + Updated | Other languages |
|
|
|
Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extractionLeyland M, Pringle E SummaryA comparison of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lens implants used in cataract surgeryCataract, defined as the presence of visually-impairing lens opacity in one or both eyes, is present in 30% of persons of 65 years and over in the UK. Modern cataract surgery is frequently accompanied by the insertion of an implant within the eye known as an intraocular lens. Monofocal intraocular lenses have one point of focus. Monofocal intraocular lenses can be used to give clear point of focus in the distance or close up, but you can only choose one focal point. Glasses provide extra lens power which enables focussing at other points in space, such as close up for reading. Multifocal intraocular lenses were designed to avoid the need for glasses by providing two or more points of focus. This review identified 10 trials, and a further three are pending review, comparing monofocal to multifocal intraocular lenses. Unfortunately near vision and subjective outcomes were poorly assessed in these trials. The distance vision without glasses was similar in both groups. Near vision without glasses, however, was better in the multifocal group and participants in this group were more likely to achieve total freedom from glasses. Multifocal intraocular lenses had drawbacks; they were associated with symptoms of halos around lights, and a reduced contrast sensitivity (the ability to distinguish an object against a background which is similar to the object itself). Thus multifocal intraocular lens implants reduce spectacle dependence after cataract surgery but at the expense of clarity. Ultimately it will be up to the individual to decide which type of lens they would prefer.
This is a Cochrane review abstract and plain language summary, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009 Issue 2, Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).
This version first published online:
July 23. 2001 AbstractBackgroundGood unaided distance visual acuity is now a realistic expectation following cataract surgery and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Near vision however still requires additional refractive power usually in the form of reading glasses. Multiple optic (multifocal) IOLs are available which claim to allow good vision at a range of distances. It is unclear whether this benefit outweighs the optical compromises inherent in multifocal IOLs. ObjectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of multifocal IOLs, including effects on visual acuity, subjective visual satisfaction, spectacle dependence, glare and contrast sensitivity, compared to standard monofocal lenses. Search strategyWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which includes the Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (2006, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2006), EMBASE (1980 to July 2006), NRR (2006, Issue 3) and PUBMED searched on 25 July 2006, limit: 90 days (entry date). We searched the reference lists of relevant articles and contacted investigators of included studies and manufacturers of multifocal intraocular lenses for information about additional published and unpublished studies. Selection criteriaAll randomised controlled trials comparing a multifocal IOL of any type with a monofocal IOL as control were included. Both unilateral and bilateral implantation trials were included. Data collection and analysisData were collected and trial quality was assessed. Where possible, statistical summary measures were calculated otherwise data were tabulated. Main resultsTen trials were identified, and a further three are pending review. There was significant variability between the trials in which outcomes were reported. Unaided distance acuity was similar in multifocal and monofocal IOLs (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.03, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) -0.13 to 0.19). There was no statistical difference between multifocal IOLs and monofocals with respect to the proportion of participants achieving 6/6 best corrected visual acuity (Peto odds ratio (OR) 1.05, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.63). Unaided near vision was improved with the multifocal IOLs. Total freedom from use of glasses was achieved more frequently with multifocal than monofocal IOLs (OR for spectacle dependence 0.17, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.24). Adverse effects included reduced contrast sensitivity and the subjective experience of haloes around lights. Authors' conclusionsMultifocal IOLs are effective at improving near vision relative to monofocal IOLs. Whether that improvement outweighs the adverse effects of multifocal IOLs will vary between patients. Motivation to achieve spectacle independence is likely to be the deciding factor. |