Analgetski učinak antipsihotika za liječenje akutne i kronične boli kod odraslih

Lijekovi koji se nazivaju „antipsihotici“, a koji se koriste za liječenje određenih duševnih poremećaja, ponekad se koriste i za liječenje kronične boli. Sada je dostupna nova generacija tih lijekova, koja se naziva „atipični antipsihotici“, i koja ima manje nuspojava i više korisnih učinaka. Autori Cochrane sustavnog pregleda analizirali su učinak tih lijekova na bol i njihove nuspojave. Temeljem 5 od 11 kliničkih studija koje su pronašli u medicinskoj literaturi, zaključeno je da u određenoj mjeri antipsihotici mogu biti korisni u liječenju akutne i kronične boli. Analiza tih kliničkih studija pokazala je značajno smanjenje boli nakon primjene antipsihotika, u usporedbi s placebom ili drugim lijekom. Međutim, ti se rezultati temelje na malim studijama i stoga mogu biti nepouzdani. Također je važno uzeti u obzir moguće nuspojave koje ti lijekovi mogu izazvati prije nego se propišu pacijentima.

Zaključak autora: 

The recent search found five new studies which were all excluded, so the review remains the same as previously.

Antipsychotics might be used as an add-on therapy in the treatment of painful conditions. Nevertheless, extrapyramidal and sedating side effects have to be considered before using antipsychotics for treating painful conditions.

Results for antipsychotics in the treatment of different painful conditions are mixed and most sample sizes in the reviewed RCTs are small. Further studies on atypical antipsychotics in larger double-blind placebo-controlled studies that include standardised pain assessment and documentation are warranted.

Pročitajte cijeli sažetak ...

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 4, 2008. The role of antipsychotics as adjuvant analgesics is a subject of longstanding controversy. Neuroleptanalgesia (that is a state of quiescence, altered awareness, and analgesia produced by a combination of taking an opioid analgesic and an antipsychotic), an established term for the management of acute pain, was shown to negatively influence disease course and total mortality in unstable angina patients. Nevertheless, antipsychotics are used to treat chronic pain (for example chronic headache, fibromyalgia and diabetic neuropathia). With atypical antipsychotics, a new class of antipsychotics, both fewer extrapyramidal side effects and additional benefits may be available.


To assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of antipsychotics in acute or chronic pain in adults.

Metode pretraživanja: 

The following databases were searched: CENTRAL, on The Cochrane Library, (Issue 12 of 12, 2012); MEDLINE (1966 to 11/1/2013); EMBASE (1980 to 2013 week 03) and PsycINFO 1806 to Jan week 3 2013. Searches were run originally in 2007 and then again in 2011 and 2013.

Kriteriji odabira: 

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults prescribed any dose of an oral antipsychotic for acute or chronic pain, where subjective pain assessment was described as either the primary or a secondary outcome, were included in this review.

Prikupljanje podataka i obrada: 

Data were extracted by two independent review authors, and results were compared for differences. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion. All trials were quality scored according to the methods set out in section six of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

Glavni rezultati: 

A total of 770 participants were involved in the 11 included studies. Data from five included randomised double-blind studies showed beneficial effects of antipsychotics in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. Quantitative analysis of these studies showed a significant reduction of mean pain intensity after administration of the antipsychotic compared to placebo or another active compound, weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.78 (95% CI -2.71 to -0.85) for the continuous data; and relative risk (RR) 0.43 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.73), number needed to treat to benefit (NNT) 2.6 for the dichotomous data. Nevertheless, the test for heterogeneity was significant for both the continuous data (P = 0.0007) and the dichotomous data (P = 0.04). Obviously this makes the calculated NNT less reliable and caution is warranted when interpreting these results.

The most frequently reported adverse effects were extrapyramidal (that is involuntary movements, parkinsonism and akathisia) and sedating effects.