Interventions for preventing falls in Parkinson's disease

Review Question

In this review we assessed the evidence on the effect of interventions designed to reduce falls in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). The interventions included exercise, medication, fall-prevention education and exercise plus education combined. We excluded interventions that aimed to reduce falls due to syncope (e.g. dizziness and fainting). The evidence in this review is current to 16 July 2020.

Background

In people with PD, the emergence of frequent falls is one of the most serious disease milestones. Information about effective fall-prevention strategies will aid the implementation of fall-prevention interventions.

Study characteristics

We included 32 randomised controlled trials with 3370 participants. Of these, 25 studies with 2700 participants were exercise trials. Three studies with 242 participants were medication trials. One study with 53 participants was an education trial. Three studies with 375 participants were exercise plus education trials. Overall, the exercise and exercise plus education studies included people with mild to moderate PD.

Key results

Twelve studies compared exercise with a control intervention not thought to reduce falls. Exercise probably reduces the number of falls by around 26%. Exercise probably slightly reduces the number of people experiencing one or more falls by around 10%.  Exercise may slightly improve health-related quality of life immediately after the exercise program. However, we are uncertain if it reduces the number of fall-related fractures, if it has an effect on the number of adverse events or if it is a cost-effective intervention for fall prevention.

Three studies compared a cholinesterase inhibitor (either rivastigmine or donepezil) with placebo medication (an inactive treatment) and found that this medication may reduce the rate of falls by around 50%. However, the effect of this medication on the number of people experiencing one or more falls, and on health-related quality of life was uncertain. Cholinesterase inhibitor medication may increase the number of non fall related adverse events by around 60%. There was no information about the cost-effectiveness of medication for fall prevention.

One study compared education alone and three studies compared exercise plus education with a control group. Exercise plus education may make little or no difference to the number of people experiencing one or more falls. However, we are uncertain of the effects of these interventions on the other fall and non-fall outcomes.

Certainty of the evidence

All studies had high or unclear risk of bias in at least one area. This could have influenced how the studies were conducted and how the outcomes were assessed.

For the exercise interventions, the certainty of the evidence for the rate of falls and the number of people experiencing one or more falls was moderate. The certainty of the evidence was low or very low for all other outcomes.

For medication, the education and the exercise plus education interventions, the certainty of the evidence was low to very low for all outcomes.

Authors' conclusions: 

Exercise interventions probably reduce the rate of falls, and probably slightly reduce the number of people falling in people with mild to moderate PD. 

Cholinesterase inhibitors may reduce the rate of falls, but we are uncertain if they have an effect on the number of people falling. The decision to use these medications needs to be balanced against the risk of non fall-related adverse events, though these adverse events were predominantly mild or transient in nature.

Further research in the form of large, high-quality RCTs are required to determine the relative impact of different types of exercise and different levels of supervision on falls, and how this could be influenced by disease severity. Further work is also needed to increase the certainty of the effects of medication and further explore falls prevention education interventions both delivered alone and in combination with exercise.

Read the full abstract...
Background: 

Most people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) experience at least one fall during the course of their disease. Several interventions designed to reduce falls have been studied. An up-to-date synthesis of evidence for interventions to reduce falls in people with PD will assist with informed decisions regarding fall-prevention interventions for people with PD.

Objectives: 

To assess the effects of interventions designed to reduce falls in people with PD.

Search strategy: 

CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases and two trials registers were searched on 16 July 2020, together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. We also conducted a top-up search on 13 October 2021.

Selection criteria: 

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions that aimed to reduce falls in people with PD and reported the effect on falls. We excluded interventions that aimed to reduce falls due to syncope.

Data collection and analysis: 

We used standard Cochrane Review procedures. Primary outcomes were rate of falls and number of people who fell at least once. Secondary outcomes were the number of people sustaining one or more fall-related fractures, quality of life, adverse events and economic outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

Main results: 

This review includes 32 studies with 3370 participants randomised. We included 25 studies of exercise interventions (2700 participants), three studies of medication interventions (242 participants), one study of fall-prevention education (53 participants) and three studies of exercise plus education (375 participants). Overall, participants in the exercise trials and the exercise plus education trials had mild to moderate PD, while participants in the medication trials included those with more advanced disease. All studies had a high or unclear risk of bias in one or more items. Illustrative risks demonstrating the absolute impact of each intervention are presented in the summary of findings tables.

Twelve studies compared exercise (all types) with a control intervention (an intervention not thought to reduce falls, such as usual care or sham exercise) in people with mild to moderate PD. Exercise probably reduces the rate of falls by 26% (rate ratio (RaR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 0.87; 1456 participants, 12 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Exercise probably slightly reduces the number of people experiencing one or more falls by 10% (risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.00; 932 participants, 9 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). 

We are uncertain whether exercise makes little or no difference to the number of people experiencing one or more fall-related fractures (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.17; 989 participants, 5 studies; very low-certainty evidence). Exercise may slightly improve health-related quality of life immediately following the intervention (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.17, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.01; 951 participants, 5 studies; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether exercise has an effect on adverse events or whether exercise is a cost-effective intervention for fall prevention.

Three studies trialled a cholinesterase inhibitor (rivastigmine or donepezil). Cholinesterase inhibitors may reduce the rate of falls by 50% (RaR 0.50, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.58; 229 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence). However, we are uncertain if this medication makes little or no difference to the number of people experiencing one or more falls (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.14; 230 participants, 3 studies) and to health-related quality of life (EQ5D Thermometer mean difference (MD) 3.00, 95% CI -3.06 to 9.06; very low-certainty evidence). Cholinesterase inhibitors may increase the rate of non fall-related adverse events by 60% (RaR 1.60, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.01; 175 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). Most adverse events were mild and transient in nature.  No data was available regarding the cost-effectiveness of medication for fall prevention.

We are uncertain of the effect of education compared to a control intervention on the number of people who fell at least once (RR 10.89, 95% CI 1.26 to 94.03; 53 participants, 1 study; very low-certainty evidence), and no data were available for the other outcomes of interest for this comparisonWe are also uncertain (very low-certainty evidence) whether exercise combined with education makes little or no difference to the number of falls (RaR 0.46, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.85; 320 participants, 2 studies), the number of people sustaining fall-related fractures (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.40 to 5.32,320 participants, 2 studies), or health-related quality of life (PDQ39 MD 0.05, 95% CI -3.12 to 3.23, 305 participants, 2 studies). Exercise plus education may make little or no difference to the number of people experiencing one or more falls (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.07; 352 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether exercise combined with education has an effect on adverse events or is a cost-effective intervention for fall prevention.