A-Z index   help

Copy Edit Support helps CRG staff to achieve a high standard of copy editing in reviews being prepared for submission. Submissions are checked against the Cochrane Style Guide, other Cochrane guidelines, and standard biomedical technical editing guidelines where required.

We have begun to copy edit reviews in RevMan format within Archie. This means that:

• You no longer need to export and import your reviews between RevMan and Word.
• You no longer need to transfer copy edits manually from a Word document to the RevMan file.

If you already participate in Copy Edit Support and are still receiving your copy edited files in MS Word format, ask us about transferring to Archie. If you haven’t participated recently, or if you have never taken part, why not give us a try?

The Archie process works as follows:

1. The CRG sends an email to Copy Edit Support to say that a review is ready for copy editing.

2. Copy Edit Support confirms receipt of this and, if possible, lets the CRG know immediately which copy editor the review has been assigned to. The copy editor is cc'ed on this response so that she too is advised of the assignment. (If it is not possible to do this all in one step, Copy Edit Support confirms receipt in one e-mail and then sends a separate e-mail advising when the copy editor has been assigned.)

3. The CRG authorizes the named copy editor to have the necessary document permissions on the review in question.

4. The copy editor checks the review out of Archie, copy edits it, and checks it back in.

5. The copy editor lets the CRG know when the review has been copy edited.

6. The CRG can then check the review against the pre-copy edited version using the 'compare documents' function in Archie, raise any queries as necessary with the copy editor, and approve the review for publication.

Copy Edit Support does not aim to replace the function of the copy editors working at editorial bases. All reviews submitted should have first gone through the copy editing process at the CRG level. Copy Edit Support aims to work alongside CRGs to enhance the clarity and readability of reviews.

Who is responsible for the project?

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd took over the administration of the project in 2004.

Where do I need to send reviews?

Send your reviews to Copy Edit Support at cochranecopyed@wiley.co.uk.

Who will copy edit my reviews?

Wiley employs a team of freelance copy editors. The members of the current team (with their Cochrane Collaboration affiliations in brackets) are:

• Margaret Carver;

• Kirsty Loudon (co-author of a Cochrane review; formerly review group co-ordinator);

• Nancy Owens (Copy Edit Support administrator; content editor, www.cochrane.org; former review group and centre co-ordinator, and Quality Improvement Manager);

• Elizabeth Royle (former review group co-ordinator);

• Ann Scott (member of advisory board, Cochrane Back Group; voluntary external reviewer);

• Janet Wale (member of the Cochrane Consumer Network).

Copy Edit Support is also recruiting and training new copy editors. For more information, send an inquiry to cochranecopyed@wiley.co.uk.

What are the Copy Edit Support deadlines?

Issue 2, 2008: Wednesday, 30 January

Issue 3, 2008: Wednesday, 23 April

Issue 4, 2008: Wednesday, 23 July

Issue 1, 2009: Wednesday, 22 October

For module submission deadlines and publication dates, see http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/mrwhome/106568753/SubmissionDeadlines.html

Are protocols eligible?

Yes. We accept new reviews, updated reviews, and protocols. New reviews take priority.

When should I submit my reviews?

Please notify us as soon as your review is ready for copy editing, even if you do not plan to publish it in the forthcoming issue. To guarantee the return of your copy edited review in time for inclusion in a particular issue, we need to receive the review on, or preferably before, the Copy Edit Support deadline (see above).

When will I get the reviews back?

Reviews submitted on or before the deadline will be returned no later than one week before the same module submission deadline. Reviews sent during off-peak periods (ie not during the three-week peak period prior to a module submission deadline) can be returned sooner.

What should I do after I get my reviews back?

The copy editor will let you know when the review has been copy edited. You can then check the review against the pre-copy edited version using the 'compare documents' function in Archie, raise any queries as necessary with the copy editor, and approve the review for publication.

Questions?

If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please contact cochranecopyed@wiley.co.uk.