The Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane Reviews
by sub-topics:

Cochrane Methodology Reviews are an integral part of The Cochrane Collaboration's methodological research output, and help develop methods used in intervention reviews. You can read the completed review abstracts here, as well as citations for titles (planned reviews) and protocols (begun reviews), by clicking on the titles below. For full text, click the 'Full text' button in the top right of the screen. Learn more in the Methods Groups Newsletter.

For complete list (no sub-topics), click here - Browse by sub-topic (Review Group)

Can't find a review topic below covering your question or interest? Suggest one:
*

Methodology Review Group (23)
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (0)
Comparisons of systematic and non-systematic reviews (0)
PROBLEM FORMULATION (0)
Bias in how problems are formulated and the specification of selection criteria (0)
DATA COLLECTION (2)
Individual patient data after extensive data-checking versus individual patient data supplied initially (0)
Published and unpublished data versus only published data (0)
Methods for obtaining unpublished data (0)
ASSESSMENT OF STUDY VALIDITY (Critical appraisal, see \"bias in trials\" below) (0)
Scales and checklists for trials (0)
Scales and checklists for different study designs, including cohort studies, case-control studies, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series analyses (0)
Methods for incorporating assessments of validity in reviews (0)
Trial quality as assessed using individual patient data versus quality as assessed from published reports (0)
META-ANALYSIS (1)
Quantitative versus qualitative methods of analysis (0)
Tests for heterogeneity (power and bias) (0)
Subgroup analyses versus overall analyses (0)
Random effects versus fixed effect models (0)
Combining trials with dichotomous data (0)
Combining survival (time to event) data (0)
Combining trials with ordinal data (0)
Combining trials with continuous data (0)
Combining trials with mixed dichotomous and continuous data (0)
Combining parallel group and cross-over trials (0)
Combining trials with group allocation (0)
Combining trials with different outcomes (0)
Combining quality of life data (0)
Combining resource utilization (economic) data (0)
Combining studies with observational data (0)
Methods for handling missing data (0)
Methods for handling multiple comparisons (0)
Methods for sensitivity analyses (including funnel plots and cumulative meta-analysis) (0)
Bayesian meta-analysis (0)
Incorporating qualitative data in reviews (0)
APPLICABILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS (0)
Examination of effect modification (i.e. interaction between treatment and a predictor), including meta-regression and other methods for subgroup comparisons (0)
(Non) - constancy of relative risk at different levels of baseline risk (0)
Prediction of the individual's risk in order to predict absolute benefits and harms (0)
Levels of evidence and strength of recommendations (0)
Causal inferences (0)
PRESENTATION OF REVIEWS (0)
More informative titles (0)
More informative abstracts (structured abstracts) (0)
Assessments of the quality of reviews (0)
Merits of alternative summary statistics (e.g. odds ratio, relative risk, number needed to treat) for analysing and presenting results (0)
Graphical presentation of meta-analyses (0)
Framing effects (e.g. presentation of results as a positive statement about the proportion of patients who survived or a negative statement about the proportion who died) (0)
Presentation and weighing up of benefits and harms for individual patients (0)
EVALUATION METHODOLOGY (13)
Comparisons between different study designs, including randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series analyses (0)
Screening and diagnostic tests (1)
Methods for meta-analysis of test performance (0)
Assessments of the applicability of studies of test accuracy (0)
Descriptions of epidemiology of evaluations of healthcare (0)