|
The Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane Reviews |
| Explore | New + Updated | Other languages |
|
|
|
Wound cleansing for pressure ulcersMoore ZEH, Cowman S SummaryWound cleansing to help pressure ulcers heal.There is no good evidence that cleansing pressure ulcers (bed sores), or cleansing with a particular solution, helps healing. Very little research has studied the cleansing of pressure ulcers (bed sores) and therefore we are unable to draw any firm conclusions.
This is a Cochrane review abstract and plain language summary, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009 Issue 4, Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).
This version first published online:
October 19. 2005 AbstractBackgroundPressure ulcers (also called pressure sores, bed sores and decubitus ulcers) are areas of tissue damage that occur in the very old, malnourished or acutely ill, who cannot reposition themselves. Pressure ulcers impose a significant financial burden on health care systems and negatively affect quality of life. Wound cleansing is considered an important component of pressure ulcer care. ObjectivesThis systematic review seeks to answer the following question: Search strategyFor this first update we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (November 2007), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) - The Cochrane Library 2007 Issue 4, Ovid MEDLINE - 1950 to November Week 2 2007, Ovid EMBASE - 1980 to 2007 Week 46 and Ovid CINAHL - 1982 to November Week 3 2007. Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing wound cleansing with no wound cleansing, or different wound cleansing solutions, or different cleansing techniques, were eligible for inclusion if they reported an objective measure of pressure ulcer healing. Data collection and analysisTwo authors extracted data independently and resolved disagreements through discussion and reference to the Cochrane Wounds Group editorial base. A structured narrative summary of the included studies was conducted. For dichotomous outcomes, relative risk (RR), plus 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated; for continuous outcomes, weighted mean difference (WMD), plus 95% CI were calculated. Meta analysis was not conducted, because of the small number of diverse RCTs identified. Main resultsNo additional studies were identified by the updated search. Three studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. No studies compared cleansing with no cleansing. Two studies compared different wound cleansing solutions: a statistically significant improvement in Pressure Sore Status Tool scores occurred for wounds cleansed with saline spray containing Aloe vera, silver chloride and decyl glucoside (Vulnopur) compared to isotonic saline (P value = 0.025), but no statistically significant change in healing was seen when water was compared to saline (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.21 to 41.89). One study compared cleansing techniques, but no statistically significant change in healing was seen for ulcers cleansed with, or without, a whirlpool (RR 2.10, 95% CI 0.93 to 4.76). Authors' conclusionsWe identified only three studies addressing cleansing of pressure ulcers. One noted a statistically significant improvement in pressure ulcer healing for wounds cleansed with saline spray containing Aloe vera, silver chloride and decyl glucoside (Vulnopur) when compared with isotonic saline solution. Overall, there is no good trial evidence to support use of any particular wound cleansing solution or technique for pressure ulcers. |