|
The Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane Reviews |
| Explore | New + Updated | Other languages |
|
|
|
Methotrexate for ankylosing spondylitisChen J, Liu C, Lin J SummaryMethotrexate for ankylosing spondylitisThis summary of a Cochrane review presents what we know from research about the effect of methotrexate for ankylosing spondylitis. The review shows that: There is silver level evidence (www.cochranemsk.org) that for people with ankylosing spondylitis, methotrexate may not improve overall disease activity, physical function, overall pain, pain, tenderness and swelling in the ligaments of the joints, movement of the spine, stiffness or overall well being. It may not cause serious side effects. But there is not enough evidence to be certain of the benefits and harms of methotrexate for ankylosing spondylitis and more research is needed.
Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are usually used to stop the pain and stiffness. When people do not do well with NSAIDs, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as methotrexate, are sometimes prescribed. It is not known whether methotrexate controls pain and stiffness in AS, slows the progress of AS, or can stop joint damage.
What are the results of this review?
may not improve overall disease activity, physical function, overall pain, pain, tenderness or swelling in the ligaments of the joints, movement of the spine, stiffness and overall well being. But there is not enough evidence to be certain.
This is a Cochrane review abstract and plain language summary, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009 Issue 4, Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).
This version first published online:
July 19. 2004 AbstractBackgroundAnkylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown cause, characterised by sacroiliitis and spondylitis. Generally, treatment is limited to the alleviation of symptoms using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Recently, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been used for patients for whom NSAIDs do not work. Methotrexate (MTX), a widely used DMARD, is effective for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and so might work for AS too. ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of MTX for treating AS. Search strategyWe conducted searches in any language in: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2005); MEDLINE (1966 to November 20, 2005); EMBASE (1980 to November 20, 2005); CINAHL (1982 to November 20, 2005), and the reference sections of retrieved articles. Selection criteriaRandomised and quasi-randomised trials examining the efficacy of MTX versus placebo, other medication, or no medication, for AS. Data collection and analysisTwo reviewers independently assessed unblinded trial reports for inclusion, assessed methodological quality and entered trial data into RevMan 4.2 using the double-entry facility. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. In the absence of significant heterogeneity, results for continuous data were combined using weighted mean difference or standardised mean difference. Relative risk was used for dichotomous data. Main resultsThree trials, involving 116 patients, were included. One 12-month trial compared naproxen plus MTX with naproxen alone. Two 24-week trials compared different doses of MTX with placebo. No statistically significant differences were found for the primary outcome measures of physical function, pain, spinal mobility, peripheral joints/entheses pain, swelling and tenderness, changes in spine radiographs and patient and physician global assessment. Only the response rate in one trial showed a statistically significant benefit of 36% in the MTX group compared to the placebo group (RR 3.18, 95% CI 1.03 to 9.79). This response rate was a composite index that included assessments of morning stiffness, physical well-being, Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI), health assessment questionnaire for spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S), and physician and patient global assessment. However, no single outcome showed a statistically significant difference between the MTX and placebo groups when endpoint results were compared. Therefore, this benefit of MTX is questionable. No serious side effects were reported in these trials. Authors' conclusionsThere is not enough evidence to support any benefit of MTX in the treatment of AS. High-quality randomised controlled trials of longer durations and with larger sample sizes are needed to clarify the effect(s) of MTX on AS. |