|
The Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane Reviews |
| Explore | New + Updated | Other languages |
|
 |
Early discharge with home support of gavage feeding for stable preterm infants who have not established full oral feedsCollins CT, Makrides M, McPhee AJ
Bookmark this:
     more ...
SummaryEarly discharge with home support of gavage feeding for stable preterm infants who have not established full oral feedsThere is not enough strong evidence regarding the effects of early home discharge for preterm babies who are stable but still need gavage (tube) feeds. Babies born preterm (before 37 weeks) are not usually discharged from hospital until they are able to suck all their feeds. Early discharge of babies who are stable but still need gavage (tube) feeds could unite families sooner and might reduce costs. These babies could graduate to full sucking feeds at home, with some professional support. However, this could also be a burden for the family and might increase complications in the transition from tube-feeding. The review found there is not enough strong evidence to show the effects of early home discharge of stable preterm babies still having gavage feeds.
This is a Cochrane review abstract and plain language summary, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010 Issue 1, Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).
This version first published online:
October 20. 2003 AbstractBackgroundEarly discharge of stable preterm infants still requiring gavage feeds has the potential benefits of uniting families sooner and reducing health care and family costs compared to discharge home when on full sucking feeds. Potential disadvantages of early discharge include the increased burden for the family and the possibility of complications related to gavage feeding. ObjectivesTo determine the effects of a policy of early discharge of stable preterm infants with home support of gavage feeding compared with a policy of discharge of such infants when they have reached full sucking feeds. Search strategyThe standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used together with additional searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2007), CINAHL (1982 to June week 4 2007), EMBASE (1980 to 2003 week 15) and MEDLINE (1950 to June week 4 2007). No new trials were found. Selection criteriaAll randomised and quasi-randomised trials among infants born < 37 weeks and requiring no intravenous nutrition at the point of discharge were included. Included trials were required to compare early discharge home with gavage feeds and health care support with later discharge home when full sucking feeds were attained. Data collection and analysisTwo reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Data analysis was done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Main resultsData from one quasi-randomised trial with 88 infants from 75 families were included in the review. Infants in the early discharge program with home gavage feeding had a mean hospital stay that was 9.3 days shorter [MD -9.3 (-18.49 to -0.11)] than infants in the control group. Infants in the early discharge program also had a lower risk of clinical infection during the home gavage period compared with the corresponding time in hospital for the control group [relative risk 0.35 (0.17 to 0.69)]. There were no significant differences between groups in duration and extent of breast feeding, weight gain, re-admission within the first 12 months post discharge from the home gavage program or from hospital, scores reflecting parental satisfaction, or health service use. Authors' conclusionsExperimental evidence to evaluate the benefits and risks in preterm infants of early discharge from hospital with home gavage feeding compared with later discharge upon attainment of full sucking feeds is limited to the results of one small quasi-randomised controlled trial. High quality trials with concealed allocation, complete follow-up of all randomised infants and adequate sample size are needed before practice recommendations can be made. |