|
The Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane Reviews |
| Explore | New + Updated | Other languages |
|
|
|
Services for helping acute stroke patients avoid hospital admissionLanghorne P, Dennis M, Kalra L, Shepperd S, Wade D, Wolfe CDA SummaryServices for helping acute stroke patients avoid hospital admissionA person experiences a stroke when a blood clot blocks a blood vessel in or to the brain or when there is bleeding in the brain. The damage caused (focal neurological deficit) is a major cause of death and disability. Stroke patients are usually admitted to hospital, either into special stroke units or general wards, for immediate health care, physical support and rehabilitation. It may be possible to avoid admission to hospital or to reduce the length of stay by providing community support. This is known as hospital-at-home. The reasoning is that home services can provide equivalent or better patient outcomes at a lower cost and that they are likely to be preferred by patients and carers. The review authors searched the medical literature looking for controlled studies that compared care of people with recent strokes at home using a community support team versus conventional care using the usual referral process by a general practitioner or local service and which includes admission to hospital. Patient and carer outcomes reflecting the consequences of disability, death, dependency and requirement for change of residence were not obviously different with the two types of healthcare service, based on three studies. It was not clear that the need for a hospital bed was less with hospital-at-home care. These studies had a total of 921 people assessed three to 12 months after a stroke. The majority of participants (857 people) were from one of the studies where the service they received was based on the medical general practice they attended. Determining how a person felt about their health, their mood and satisfaction with healthcare management was difficult to assess because many people were unable to complete the details in a questionnaire because of the effects of their stroke. The small number of studies and the number of participants make it difficult to determine any harms of treatment at home. The evidence did not seem to justify a radical shift in the care of acute stroke patients from hospital-based care.
This is a Cochrane review abstract and plain language summary, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009 Issue 4, Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).
This version first published online:
July 26. 1999 AbstractBackgroundStroke patients are usually admitted to hospital for their acute care and rehabilitation. Services to help acute stroke patients avoid admission to hospital ('hospital-at-home') have now been developed. ObjectivesTo establish the costs and effects of such services compared with conventional services. Search strategyWe searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register in March 1999 and supplemented this through discussion with colleagues and trialists. Selection criteriaControlled clinical trials recruiting stroke patients who have not been admitted to hospital and compare (1) services which provided support with an aim of helping prevent admission to hospital with (20 conventional services (which could include hospital admission). Data collection and analysisTwo independent review authors determined the eligibility and methodological quality of trials. Trialists were then contacted to obtain standardised descriptive and outcome data. Main resultsFour trials are included in the review, of which three currently have outcome data available (921 patients; 857 from one controlled trial, 64 from two randomised trials). There were no statistically significant differences between the patient and carer outcomes of the intervention and control groups either within individual trials or in pooled analyses. There was a trend toward greater hospital bed use and increased costs in the intervention groups. Authors' conclusionsThere is currently no evidence from clinical trials to support a radical shift in the care of acute stroke patients from hospital-based care. |